Is he the only leader that practiced socialism correctly?

him, also Tito, Gaddafi and Nasser.

File: buster.jpg (67KB, 720x552px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 720x552px

>>2179101
>Gaddafi and Nasser

>>2179087
it looked like he was carrying a wounded child in the thumbnail

>>2179087
>means of production were privately owned
how socialist of him

File: fedoratip.jpg (53KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 640x640px

>>2179247
>wanting the international Jewry to profit from your production

how Jewry of you

>>2179087

By purging all the socialists from the party on the night of long knives?

>>2179247
correct answer
>>2179263
and here is /pol/

You guys are getting even more stupid, if such a thing is even possible

>>2179949
>p-l is le dumb XDD

Not an argument.

>>2180025

>>2179247
>guys states a simple fact that shows how stupid this thread is

>>2179263
JEWJEWJEW

Yes /pol/ thats why no one likes you or takes you for full.

socialism doesn't just describe perfect state control over means of production. Generally and because the dialectic has moved so far right, socialism has become synonymous with a mixed economy. Bernie Sanders is technically not socialist and neither was hitler, at least not completely. They're more accurately mixed-economy-ists. But in popular discourse, if you're anything but a brain-addled adherant to the church of liberitarianism, you're a socialist.