Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
>Direct Democracy
Majority of people vote for the subjugation for the remaining number of people. Majority of people can vote to remove freedoms of the rest of the populace and the future freedoms of their descendants, therefore rendering future majorities who are against such laws obsolete as it has already passed into law.
>Representative Democracy
You vote for individuals who will gradually erode your privacy and vote in laws which will negatively effect you in order to protest themselves and garner more profit.
>Constitutional Monarchy
Logically inconsistent. Especially in the susceptibility for monarchs to be manipulated in old and young age and the strange necessity for a parliament to exist in restricting a monarch implying that parliament is of higher knowledge or rationality yet simultaneously maintaining the monarch.
>Autocracy (Absolute Monarchy and Dictatorship)
Inability for citizens to properly affect change and express their opinions, can be open to brutality in order to maintain established order and too easy for it to be abused by a corrupt individual. Leads to instability when revolutions are formed or coup d'etats resulting in many deaths. Also suffers from the previous problem outlined or susceptibility in young and old age.
>Technocracy
Far too reductive. Forgets that scientific methods and knowledge is always changing and to base laws and decision-making on science is too reductive as it is constantly in a flux and changes based on new evidence and methodology or lack thereof and is too flippant in its denial of ethical and moral philosophy.
>>
>Anarchy
Reduction in the standard of living, open to abuse, tendency towards acting like a state whilst rejecting such a title. Unlikely to be considered by the majority of people as they are unwilling to give up a level of living they have worked towards. Essentially requires individuals to organise and engage in communal tasks, allocating resources etc. which is significantly more difficult than having a state and more difficult to deal with considering current population levels, could result in chaos, famine, starvation and a multitude of other problems.
>Meritocracy
How is this measured? Too subjective.
>Theocracy
Problems exist for obvious reasons, don't need to measured out.
Wtf, all of these systems are shit!
>>
I like this copypasta but what about some socialist forms of government.
Some forms of socialism to consider:
>Communism
>Communalism
>Fourierism
>>
>>2167900
>Direct Democracy
The Swiss use direct democracy and apparently they are quite happy with it, minorities included.
>>
>>2167919
That's only because of their culture.
One day it will flip.
>>
>>2167935
>That's only because of their culture.
What culture, they have 4 different languages and no common culture.
Their system works because it is not a "winner takes it all" system, but a concordance type government.
Thread posts: 7
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1