Absolute truth exists?

>>2167179
>define absolute
>define truth

Dogshit threads exist.

>>2167188
I mean, absolute truth would be a truth that is unconditional, will always be a truth independent of time/space. Or not?

>>2167201
>>2167188
That proves to be truth on all of its spectrum. Like, "there's absolutely no round squares". This is an absolute truth, right?

>>2167179
if something happened then its necessarily truthful that it did

We don't know if we can perceive or think about the absolute truth

>>2168173
But it is impossible to argue against absolute truth, because when you say that it doesn't exists, you are self-contradicting

Your truth is relevant only to your perspective from your particularly coordinates in spacetime.

>>2167218
define round and define square

>>2167179
Yeah. Try the dialectic out sometime and overcome subjectivity/perspective my friend.

I don't know. Did the Fatima miracle of the sun happen? The people who witnessed it would say it was the absolute truth, wouldn't they?

>>2168325
>We can't have an understanding of what we can't precisely define
>laughingwittgenstein&basicallyallcurrentanalyticalphilosophers.png
>>2168258
This is correct, but people who don't believe in absolute truth don't really mind self contradiction. It's like denying a proof 1=0 by saying '1=0 is a contradiction therefore it isn't true.' Relativism can deny the principle of non contradiction or law of the excluded middle.
>>2168296
>Reasonable but ambiguous subjective objectivity position
>Physicalist
huh?

File: 1398398919512.png (541KB, 1187x1070px) Image search: [Google]

541KB, 1187x1070px

Smogon did nothing wrong

>>2168656
Bullshit, they did astounding work on How to use Delcatty strategy

>>2167188
Absolute as in objective, non-subjective, non-mind dependant.

Truth according to the correspondence theory of truth.

>>2167179
A=A

the countless presuppositions behind this statement are all false

define define

>>2167218
True but only because there are absolutely no squares.

>>2167179
Yes, but its unknowable

>>2168654
How can relativism deny these subjects?

>>2168654
>This is correct, but people who don't believe in absolute truth don't really mind self contradiction.

I sense ressentiment

>>2167179
What are some truths that exist without any context. ANY CONTEXT.

Absolute truths exist. Here are some

1. A straight line is that which terminal or infinite, never having any two points on it be less or more of an angle than 180 degrees, where 90 degrees is the angle formed by a line intersecting said line creating four equal angles each 90 degrees.

Try to prove I've committed a Petito Principii with this statement.

2. A unit is composed in every number that follows it, commensurable in units.