Why do edgy teens, hipsters and internet fedoras circle jerk to Nietzsche but ignore the superior Heidegger?
>>2163278
Because he was a filthy nazi
>>2163299
LOL, but the irony is thanks to his sister Nietzsche helped influence the core of Nazi philosophy.
>>2163350
Exactly, the sister was filthy, not Nietzsche.
Phenomenology is hard to get into and a bit counter-intuitive to western thought.
>>2163278
Because his philosophy is boring, faggy, and wrong.
>>2163833
>wrong.
Too hard to read. Simple answer.
You can't score with cheap humanities sluts with heidegger, but nietzsche?
>Form displays the relation [to beings] itself as the state of original comportment toward beings, the festive state in which the being itself in its essence is celebrated and thus for the first time placed in the open.
>To stamp becoming with the character of being—that is the supreme will to power.” (WM 617) This suggests that becoming only is if it is grounded in being as being: “That everything recurs is the closest approximation of a world of becoming to one of being.”
>For anyone who at the end of Western philosophy can and must still question philosophically, the decisive question is no longer merely “What basic character do beings manifest?” or “How may the being of beings be characterized?” but “What is this ‘being’ itself?” The decisive question is that of “the meaning of being,” not merely that of the being of beings.
>Being is only Being for Dasein
>The Geschick of being: a child that plays... Why does it play, the great child of the world-play Heraclitus brought into view in the aiôn? It plays, because it plays. The "because" withers away in the play. The play is without "why." It plays since it plays. It simply remains a play: the most elevated and the most profound. But this "simply" is everything, the one, the only... The question remains whether and how we, hearing the movements of this play, play along and accommodate ourselves to the play.
thats why
>>2163833
Typical Nietzsche pleb
>>2163833
I'm not a huge Heidegger fan, but this is flat wrong.
>>2163896
>reading Heidegger in English
>>2163940
>reading Heidegger at all
>>2163278
>Falling for the Heidy meme
Yo, we're beings situated in a context. Here's a big dumb book because i want to seem smart.