What is his endgame?

a spandau on every corner

File: tmp_1066-1480706233346-1863025596.webm (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>2153311
Reinforcing anglo supremacy through psychological warfare

>>2153311
Return of the Empire

>>2153311
Balkanization of France.

Nobody truly understands the Eternal Anglo.

>>2153362
The shifty perfidious albion doesnt understand itself either.

>>2153311

Correcting the record of history,from the absurd idea of riding a horse into battle to understanding why the churchill and bren singlehandetly shifted the tide of the war.

>>2153311

To get lots of youtube hits and money sent by making bizarre, provocative claims in his video titles and then retreating to a more conventional point in the video itself, which is neither revolutionary nor particularly interesting.

>>2153937

The titles are not even that controversial. It's just that retards here don't understand how questions work and are more interested in dank maymays than what the guy actually says.

>>2153311
The containment of the Eternal Baguette.

>>2153311
Getting money from youtube and spreading Anglo soft power (as if they need more of it)

>>2153957
How is "Cavalry is a stupid idea" not pretty controversial? Or how about when in his follow up video about spandau vs bren he uses the term "fan boys" in his title to discredit valid criticisms to his original video?

File: the future white male.jpg (75KB, 1024x682px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1024x682px

He's still better than the fat aussie ex-mormon who rules from his cardboard throne AKA Shadiversity

>>2153311
>knows all about medieval shit
>knows litterally nothing about modern concepts

He is an intresting lad, but don't trust him on anything other than history

To sell The Great Courses subscriptions.

File: 1475442776375.jpg (100KB, 392x409px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 392x409px

>>2153957
>>2154033
>Did the Battle of Zama actually happen?

He's definitely guilty of clickbaiting, as much as England is of Genocide in the Boer War

>>2154051
>Genocide in the Boer War
Rubbish.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLhFXIkysk4

>>2154051

And what's wrong with that title?

Did it happen? Yes.

File: Perfidious Albion.png (8KB, 247x401px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 247x401px

>>2153311
Only ANGLOS may truly understand the endgoals of fellow ANGLOS

>>2154033

Because it is a stupid idea in the time period and context in which he sets the question.

>>2154108

But amusingly, not for the reasons he sets out, which are inevitably tied up in shock cavalry usage that wasn't how cavalry was originally used.

Something to the order of "kill all Catholics" I would imagine.

File: 1481769982874.jpg (47KB, 480x479px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 480x479px

>>2154114
No

>>2154094
The question implies that there is doubt that it happened.

>>2154249

Only if you want it to be.

>>2154258

Not him, but to the non-autistic segment of the population, yes, generally, if you frame a question to something that is almost universally accepted, it implies doubt.

>Does the earth really go around the sun?

Could theoretically be an innocent question, devoid of subtext. Asked in the modern day though, where heliocentrism is pretty universally accepted, you wouldn't ask the question in the first place unless you wanted to make a statement of some sort. I mean, why would you?

>>2154271

>why would you ask that question

Because it then provides a springboard to talk about that topic.

Does the Earth really go around the sun? Yes and here's why.

>>2154280


And why would you feel a need to talk about a topic that is common knowledge? Why not just call it "orbital mechanics" if you really want to talk about 1st grade science class tier shit?

>>2154297

To tell people about that topic? To make money? The same reason any YouTube makes videos?

>>2153311
The eternal glory of Britain.

>>2155411
He actually tried to justify Market Garden. How delusional was he? What kind of tea is he having?

>>2155486
Surprisingly he doesn't drink tea.