> In professional economics, Capital was a detour into a blind alley, however historic it may be as the centerpiece of a worldwide political movement. What is said and done in its name is said and done largely by people who have never read through it, much less followed its labyrinthine reasoning from its arbitrary postulates to its empirically false conclusions. Instead, the massive volumes of Capital have become a quasi-magic touchstone—a source of assurance that somewhere and somehow a genius "proved" capitalism to be wrong and doomed, even if the specifics of this proof are unknown to those who take their certitude from it.
What did he mean by this?
Rewards of the atheist are all the shit he can buy for himself that he isnt wasting on church tithes. And also he meant that communists havent read Capital and just take what other people say about it on faith, little bit of reading comprehension and we wouldn have this shitty meme
>>2144857
he is just saying das kapital is flawed and is only popular because it attacks capitalism
>>2145960
Emerson. For whose intricate philosophy, God was impossible NOT to exist
>>2145979
And? I bet you also think it matters that a priest developed the Big Bang theory.
>>2146119
No, it's just that you quoted a man who fervently believed in God and predestination, not on the side, but as a CENTERPIECE of the philosophy, as a moral alternative to a religious sense of arduous perfunctory spirit.
Why