Social Implications of Darwinism

no but retards like you who've never read On the Origin sure do love to pretend they're "darwinist" when justifying all of those above acts

>>2131089
Like the part about the "slave-making ants?"

>>2131086
Evolution isn't science

>>2131086
Yes, that's what it does.

Daily reminder that humans live not in nature but in society, darwinism has nothing to do with politics and "Social Darwinism" is pure unbridleded retardation.

>darwinism
>icon
>an object of uncritical devotion
How many layers of irony are you on today?

hey thats no the definition of icon

>>2131103
Guess we really have to go to /pol/ for intelligent discussions.

>>2131112
>How many layers of irony are you on today?
I actually believe in a desert hogwash death cult.

it probably has the potential if you're completely retarded and don't understand the theory

it literally has nothing to do with human society, it's about diversity of species

>>2131086
>social implications of darwinism
You meant "the theory of evolution". And it has no social implications whatsoever.

>>2131126
/pol/ is exactly where the '''''''''''''''''''science'''''''''''''''''''''' of evolution pushes you: a bunch of white supremacist, social darwinist retards who don't know anything about what it means to be a good person because their theory helps discredit God.

File: BM-BD-BigLie.jpg (91KB, 973x462px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 973x462px

>>2131133
PROBLEMS WITH DARWINISM
1. Lack of a viable mechanism for producing high levels of complex and specified information. Related to this are problems with the Darwinian mechanism producing irreducibly complex features, and the problems of non-functional or deleterious intermediate stages.

2. The failure of the fossil record to provide support for Darwinian evolution.

3. The failure of molecular biology to provide evidence for a grand "tree of life."

4. Natural selection is an extremely inefficient method of spreading traits in populations unless a trait has an extremely high selection coefficient.

5. The problem that convergent evolution appears rampant -- at both the genetic and morphological levels, even though under Darwinian theory this is highly unlikely.

6. The failure of chemistry to explain the origin of the genetic code.

7. The failure of developmental biology to explain why vertebrate embryos diverge from the beginning of development.

8. The failure of neo-Darwinian evolution to explain the biogeographical distribution of many species.

9. A long history of inaccurate predictions inspired by neo-Darwinism regarding vestigial organs or so-called "junk" DNA.

10. Humans show many behavioral and cognitive traits and abilities that offer no apparent survival advantage (e.g. music, art, religion, ability to ponder the nature of the universe).

>>2131138
Do you seriously believe what you're trying to say? Religion and xenophobia went hand in hand for ages. And for your knowledge - Darwin himself wasn't an atheist, and evolutional theories have nothing to do with god, since all questions about existence and properties of deities by default lie outside of field of science.

>>2131138
>/pol/ is exactly where the '''''''''''''''''''science'''''''''''''''''''''' of evolution pushes you: a bunch of white supremacist, social darwinist retards who don't know anything about what it means to be a good person
That's where being a dissatisfied edgy idiot pushes you. And social darwinism has nothing to do with the theory of evolution beside being inspired by its misunderstanding.
>because their theory helps discredit God
It discredits the infallibility of the Old Testament, which had already been questioned (and, by some branches, outright renounced. It doesn't discredit God.

>>2131158
>Humans show many behavioral and cognitive traits and abilities that offer no apparent survival advantage (e.g. music, art, religion, ability to ponder the nature of the universe).
Because we're removed from nature. You aren't trying to survive, hence you have the time to fuck around. Domestic animals also demonstrate behaviour that would range from meaningless to dangerous out in the wild. Because they don't have to survive anymore.

>>2131161
>Old Testament
>questioned
By whom? It was my knowledge that anything the atheists question has been shot down by evidence. (Ex. Nebuchadnezzar being mentioned)

>>2131160
You're right, Darwin wasn't an atheist. He was a Christian. A very, very bad Christian. Who believed in prior theories circulating disregarding the creation of life through a predestined, divine cause.

>>2131086
Yes and Quantum mechanics caused unbridled communism, mass culture, erectile dysfunction and gambling.

>>2131176
So Earth is 6 thousands years old? Stop trolling, anybody who believed in shit like that for real wouldn't last not on this, and not on any other board.

File: Young Universe Postcard front.jpg (91KB, 610x435px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 610x435px

>>2131196
10 EVIDENCES OF A YOUNG EARTH
https://answersingenesis.org/evidence-for-creation/the-10-best-evidences-from-science-that-confirm-a-young-earth/

#1 Very Little Sediment on the Seafloor

#2 Bent Rock Layers

#3 Soft Tissue in Fossils

#4 Faint Sun Paradox

#5 Rapidly Decaying Magnetic Field

#6 Helium in Radioactive Rocks

#7 Carbon-14 in Fossils, Coal, and Diamonds

#8 Short-Lived Comets

#9 Very Little Salt in the Sea

#10 DNA in “Ancient” Bacteria

>>2131103
How delusional can one possibly be? Super bugs are literally evolving under our eyes.

File: BM-BD-HalfTruth.jpg (111KB, 1016x466px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 1016x466px

>>2131268
Baloney

>>2131338
baloney is what's coming out of your ears

you're just cuntpasting blogspots and I hope you get banned for spamming.