Why don't Europeans deal with immigrants well?

>>2126696
I agree. Because Europe is bad for immigrants let's send them all to Japan.

>>2126696
Because they let the feels brigade get into power, and now they think it's the right thing. They don't realise America brings in more immigrants every year than anyone else.
They also can't accept the fact that most of the "refugees" are just looking for an easier life by living off off the government

>>2126714

Its not that Europe is bad for immigrants, its just that Europeans seem like bungling morons who mismanage stuff then move into far-right parties when their incompetence bites them in the butt.

Classic "I'm the brilliant moral person, everybody elses fault for everything REEEEEE"

It's definitely the European's fault. The immigrants aren't total shitheads who just come to bleed the welfare state dry. No not at all. Immigrants dindu nuffin dey just going to mosque and getting dey lives back on track.

The United States was founded on Enlightenment ideals rather than representing a specific ethnic group. Immigrants retain aspects of their original cultures while contributing to the development of a distinctly American culture. Other immigrant-based nations like Canada and Argentina are similar deals.

Most European nations are ethnic nation-states; thus, a foreigner might have to completely abandon their original culture to be seen as a proper citizen (and even then it's not a guarantee).

>>2126696
What immigrants to you mean OP? Europe is a big place. I assume you mean the economic migrants, Which if it that is the case it's because they add nothing socially, culturally or economically besides creating a divided population and commiting crime.

To be honest, Europe has been getting the worst immigrants.

Just look at Arabs, for example. South America got all the "good" Arabs. The Maronites of Lebanon, the Syriac Christians of Syria, while Europe gets that garbage descended from tribal raiders from North Africa.

Not to mention the gypsies.

>>2126734
>It's definitely the European's fault.

Yes.

They should deal with refugees in a different manner than people allowed to immigrate in. You put refugees into camps for safety, you let migrants sink or swim (with maybe some assistance).

You mix the two concepts together and thats a broken system.

Modern day America gets top tier immigrants (talking only about legal ones - not beaner fence jumpers) while Europe gets literally the bottom of the garbage can. Illiterate niggers from Ghana, Moroccans, Somalis, Syrians, Iraqis, Turks, Gypsies etc, just trash.

>>2126768
>beaner fence jumpers
Even most beaner fence jumpers are decent people imho.

You don't see Algerians illegally immigrating to Europe to work construction or deliver pizza for $75 a day.

>>2126729

Immigration in a socialist system is forced Integration. They have every right to be mad.

Speaking for the UK, it's about 8 times more densely populated than the US (and about 75x that of Canada, & 18x Argentina). Plus virtually all of the non-residential land is in high value usage and/or protected by the government. I remember seeing a documentary about Bosnian refugees in the US and they basically all moved to a city and built a neighbourhood on the outskirts on cheap land and settled down there. This is impossible in the UK. It's easier to be a non-annoying immigrant when you can live in a separate area etc, and slowly 'blend in'. Immigrants in the UK move into the poorest areas, which are already full of stressed people - they put an extra burden on the area and cultures inevitably clash due to living in shitty environments on top of each other.

I don't think it's about 'euros thinking they're superior', as you can see in northern cities Pakistani immigrants complaining about the latest wave of eastern euro immigrants the way 'native' brits do.