"Politically Incorrect Guide" Series

>>2124313
Pandering to a specific audience of fundies is not "politically incorrect", it's the exact opposite.

>a pig on the front page of the Bible
Man, the Jews who wrote that thing must be rolling in their graves.

>>2124318

There are just different kinds of "political incorrectness". For example, not agreeing with the hivemind would be considered "politically incorrect" on /pol/.

File: PIGCivilWar_cover.jpg (2MB, 2218x2775px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2218x2775px

>>2124318
There's more.

>>2124313

Are there really people who still think that shit like Noah's Arc happened? I figured most people just go with "its not supposed to be literal" route for stories like those.

File: civil war slavery.png (1MB, 1864x4327px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1864x4327px

>>2124324

>confederate constitution required that every state allow slavery
>"the south had the moral high ground"
>"it was actually about state's rights!"

File: 1160_1.jpg (252KB, 2021x2560px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 2021x2560px

>>2124324
And more.

>>2124313
Pretty much everything on the cover is true

File: 9781596986497_p0_v1_s1200x630.jpg (61KB, 483x600px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 483x600px

>this triggers the socialists

File: 51y-FNssV4L._SX400_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (56KB, 402x500px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 402x500px

>>2124336
>this also triggers the socialists

>>2124336
>Nordic states
>Socialist
This fucking me me man

More like "the retarded christfag's guide to"

>>2124336

>obama
>socialist

Why are Americans so politically retarded?

>>2124339
>capitalism defeats racism
Seems like it profits from it in some ways.

>>2124335
You can directly refute the "promotes social freedom" part by quoting the rules on slavery in Leviticus.

>>2124336
Oh cool a book on the broad, sociological topic of soci--
>exists throughout the economy
Wait. What?! Our people control the means of production and organize themselves in a way to benefit the communal lives of the working class? I DID NOT KNOW THAT WE HAD SOCIALIST POLICIES.

What. The. Fuck.

St.Simonism is an example of socialism that isn't atheist like Marxism btw Creationists.

Acts 4:20

>>2124332
Some of these statements are correct somehow, but they are not what they seem to be. The books look very stupid. You can already expect what they would say in each topic and now how irrelevant and wrong they are. I read some 'political incorrect guide' before, not exactly from this author, and I would not waste my time reading more. If you want to see this kind of content for free, just navigate on Facebook a bit.

>>2124366
This is coming from a creationist as well.

>>2124369
>and know how irrelevant
Fixed.

>>2124324
HAHAHA That the south had the MORAL HIGH GROUND, and this is the kicker, "And the support of the Vatican's own newspaper." They present that statement as if its fact and use The Vatican's
(((newspaper))) to back it up! My sides are in orbit right now. Apparently Politically Incorrect means not only to offend, but to entertain!

File: slide_10.jpg (118KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 960x720px

>>2124339
Capitalism defeats racism. South had the moral high ground. Pick one.

>>2124404
>The world revolves around America: the post

>>2124537
what does that mean? where does my post imply the world, "revolves around america." or make it seem as such?

>>2124325
You don't live in the US, do you.

>>2124313
Their ones on American history and the constitution are decent. Can't speak for the others.

>>2124336
>is almost always ultra-nationalist and militarist
I wish. But socialist ideologies are very distinctly internationalist as they think that nations are memes that prevent the whole world's proleteriat (who is united by being in the same position) from rising up. This is somewhat less true for leninism and its copies (the whole socialism-in-one-state schtick), but even the Soviet Union remained internationalist nominally (in its ideology).
>is terrible for the environment
I'd say that heavy industry, emphasis on which was/is necessary for the Soviet Union/China due to the state of their development is terrible for the environment. I'd then point the finger to the US.
>benefits just one group of people: the central planners themselves
Leninism (with its clones) is just one strain of socialist thought (central planning). And this assertion is arguable even in its case.
>is not even successful in "model" socialist countries like Sweden
Sweden is not a socialist country, what the hell are you smoking?
>exists throughout the US economy
I wish.

>>2124313
>>2124324
>>2124332
>>2124336
>>2124339
Is this ironic or sincere?

>>2124330
>implying slavery is unethical

So in the USA "Politically Incorrect" mean "we will be as retarded as we can, ignore every evidences that doesn't corroborate our opinion and call everybody who disagree with us a liberal"

>>2124324
IT'S OVER ABE, I HAVE THE HIGH GROUND

File: chipmunk.jpg (15KB, 479x479px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 479x479px

>>2124339
>capitalism improves the environment.

>>2125134
hey, it worked wonders for the Alt right.
they shitposted their way to endsieg.

>>2124339
hey, this one is at least right about a few points

>>2125134
Apparently. The Christian guide contains absolutely nothing politically incorrect.

File: anakin-skywalker.jpg (32KB, 600x300px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 600x300px

>>2125143
If the South had won, we might be able to enjoy sunny days in Cuba! HAhaha. Now this is podracing!

>>2124313
Apparently some redneck thinks politically incorrect means contrarian when it doesn't

>>2124318
>Pandering to a specific audience of fundies

These books exist to correct liberal biases, you fucking faggot.

>>2125345
>>2125392
They exist to be corrective to popular distortions, most of which are encouraged by the left and the mainstream media, so yes, they are "politically incorrect". Just because they prove a group you don't like to be right doesn't change that.

>>2125544
>corrective
so blatant misrepresentation of facts is corrective against the liberal agenda now?

>>2125550
How are they misinterpreting facts? It just seems like the conclusions make you uncomfortable.

File: 104004840-1ED1-REQ-Youdbeinjail-100916.1910x1000.jpg (165KB, 1910x1000px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 1910x1000px

>>2125544
>biblical laws paved the way for democracy and limited government.

Because people rejected them.

>>2124369
>The books look very stupid. You can already expect what they would say in each topic and now how irrelevant and wrong they are.

>Literally judging a book by it's cover and not addressing it's arguments.

>>2125556
By coming up with blatant falsehoods like how science disproves evolution?

>>2125557
http://www.acton.org/pub/religion-liberty/volume-7-number-1/biblical-foundations-limited-government

>>2125562
Darwinism =/= Evolution

>>2125571
Darwinism isn't a political movement you mong.

>>2125576
When did I say it was?

>>2125579
The theory of evolution does have it's basis in darwin's work.

>>2125561
>Biblical laws paved the way for democracy
They probably never heard of athenian democracy.

>>2125581
Evolution existed as a theory long before Darwin, and modern evolutionary theory is not wholly dependant on his work.

>>2125582
Nice assumption you have there. Modern notions of "democracy", at least in America, have strong Biblical influences.

http://www.wallbuilders.com/LIBissuesArticles.asp?id=8755

People who complain about le political correctness should be gassed

>>2125592
>at least in America
Yes maybe in Ameria, but democracy have existed before America was even discovered, well Athenian democracy existed even before the bible was written. So saying "Biblical laws paved the way for democracy" is outright wrong

>>2125592
it largely is dependent on his work. The shitty book targeted it at modern evolutionary science by saying that it was ideologically driven and that Actual True Science(tm) supports intelligent design.

>>2125538
But being conservative is the norm now.

File: Donald_Trump_Phoenix_2016.jpg (997KB, 946x1403px) Image search: [Google]

997KB, 946x1403px

>>2125567
"I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church & State."

I guess from Jesus to Jefferson, their was a big fucking discrepancy between Christianity and democratic and limited government. Glad you cleared that up, despite hundreds of years of confusion on the matter.

/Chris/storian confirmed.

>>2125620
>less than half of all people who voted are conservative
>conservative is the norm
???

Those books appear to be attempts to justify prior beliefs by cherry picking sources. 0/10

>>2124313
More like 'factually incorrect'.

>>2125618
They're likely referring to American democracy, so you're just splitting hairs.

>>2125619
You're talking about a book you haven't read. Evolutionary theory is more than just Darwin, and ID and evolution are not mutually exclusive.

>>2125669
>I havn't read them.

Lot of triggered fedora fags itt.

>>2125683
Based on those covers, they are not worth reading.

>>2125649
To be fair, a tremendous number of Clinton voters weren't registered democrats or even traditionally liberal.

They were just normal neutral idiots convinced by the media that Donald Trump was a big bully and that Hillary Clinton was a sweet-but-senile old lady that was being hounded by said bully.

There are a great many more people that label themselves "Republican" or identify with staunch conservatism.
American Liberals are just very good at winning over the politically illiterate "independent" vote by using lots of emotional language.

If it's not published by a university press known for good peer-reviewed historical journals and research programs, it's just normie nonsense. It doesn't matter if it's normie nonsense that appeals to your politics or contrarian attitude either, it is what it is.

>>2124313
The one about US presidents. It's good for sources and reallyt made me look at Wilson and Harding in a totally different light though of course the title and the fact that the author sometimes uses "liberals" as a boogeyman. And it's way too soft on Reagan. Otherwise great I want more books like this.

File: 1479953857787.jpg (54KB, 480x456px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 480x456px

>>2127630
>if it isn't approved by liberal institutions because of its liberal values, it's worthless garbage
The tolerant left, everyone.

>>2127674
It's like the difference between proprietary and open source code, or between Patreon tethered artists feeding a needy niche market and a professional presenting work to other professionals and potential employers. The former fears audit for the sake of profit and brand loyalty, the latter relies on its own merits to weather criticism.

You're too old for the daycare hug box.

>>2127674
You're confusing tolerance with approval, dumbass. You people see tyranny in even a sarcastic remark and are just as bad as sjws. Back to /pol/ little /pol/storian.

File: 1482435337570.jpg (69KB, 600x740px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 600x740px

>>2127712
http://www.hoover.org

File: 1482011157661.jpg (456KB, 2880x1800px) Image search: [Google]

456KB, 2880x1800px

>>2127718
>"you need yo learn to take it up the ass like everyone else, flunkey!"

File: 1477335594069.png (371KB, 791x720px) Image search: [Google]

371KB, 791x720px

>>2127738
>think tank

File: 1480690774092.jpg (524KB, 886x1002px) Image search: [Google]

524KB, 886x1002px

>>2127742
https://www.prageru.com

File: 1481145891666.png (44KB, 235x236px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 235x236px

>>2127674
>MUH LIBRUHS ARE CONTROLLIN THE UNIVERSITIES
Grow up.

File: Focus-Piece.-Picture-3.-Safe-Space-leveller_ca.png (2MB, 1288x859px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1288x859px

>>2127756
After you, "sir"

File: 1473769480855.png (691KB, 667x720px) Image search: [Google]

691KB, 667x720px

>>2127753
>Prager """"University"""""

>>2125686
>Someone disagrees with me? Better call them triggered.

Another thread wasted. Shit. Still I like the series but I'd rather cite from sources they used than the book itself because of the format but the content is fine.

File: GallopinGish.jpg (49KB, 237x200px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 237x200px

>>2127765
http://www.hillsdale.edu/
http://www.gcc.edu/Pages/Grove-City-College.aspx
http://www.biola.edu/
http://www.udallas.edu/

We can do this all night, kid.

>>2125592
>Nice assumption you have there. Modern notions of "democracy", at least in America, have strong Biblical influences
...besides that the bible never even mentions democracy and Israel was ruled by kings and before that various chieftains?

File: 7da.jpg (52KB, 543x960px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 543x960px

>>2127767
But liberals can't not be triggered.

>If it's not approved by leftypol and the nbpp its wrong
SJW logic

Anyone read the one about literature?

File: 156561._UY500_SS500_.jpg (61KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 500x500px

>>2127878
No, but here's the cover for anyone interested.

File: university.jpg (13KB, 299x169px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 299x169px

>>2127753
>prager

>>2127741
The funny thing is you're still conflating tolerance with need for approval. Everytime somebody criticizes a conservative they complain about a lack of tolerance. The irony is that this too is a seedbed of totalitarianism, the notion that the intolerant must be tolerated without question.

File: 1481683544103.png (170KB, 847x874px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 847x874px

>>2127926
Why don't you look at the other ones, or is your head too far up your wife's son's ass to see anything?
>>2127780

File: 1480136396177m.jpg (148KB, 941x1024px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 941x1024px

>>2127932
>intolerant
That's a funny way of saying "correct"
>you on bottom left

>>2127971
Watch, out we gotta a /pol/storian over here. What thread will he invade and shitpost his obnoxious memes in next?

>>2124313
>Recent archaeological discoveries confirm the historical accuracy of many Bible stories

The other points are debatably true, but this point is pretty off.

>>2127756
Shitty maymay t b h, I've had professors who were conservative as fuck and even my lefty profs were never le triggered feminists.