What's more aesthetic, a united aegean, or a united Anatolia?

Aegean personally. One country controlling a sea looks cool as fuck. It's like a map to a new MMO

File: 800px-Map_athenian_empire_431_BC-en.svg.png (539KB, 800x640px) Image search: [Google]

539KB, 800x640px

>>2120467
this

>>2120467
United Anatolia makes more sense geopolitically. One continuous landmass > one state divided by a huge ass physical barrier

>>2120503
roman empire
[spoiler] & swedish Empire [/spoiler]

>>2120590
There's a reason the east was lost, my friend.

United agean. Thankfully the rivers of west anatolia allow natural borders inland : from the east of Constantinople along the river coming from eskisehir, continuing in the valley under Bursa, then towards Izmir up to where the river from the north joins the one coming from the south east, then up this one and around Mugla down to the bay east of Rhodes.