Honest question here, Why do all the edgy lord choose hitler as the best dictator?
I dont at all understand this from any prospective, Let me explain;
Hitler took the country of germany, gave it power for a brief period but ended up driving the country into the ground by the end of the war, germany still feels the burn of hitlers rule. For example look at the immigrant crisis. I would say hitler directly effected that today because of the guilt felt by the German people. He took a country that was basically already a super power and ended up setting it back after the war.
But now look at stalin and lenin and Communism. Lets not for get marxism/communism and socialism is still a western idea. When stalin took power the country was a backwater and he industrialized it, he gave the country an education AND nuclear capabilities as well as space capabilities.
Russia still feels the benefits from communist rule. Russia became a world power thanks to stalin. Stalin accomplished more, he quite literally started with peasants and became powerful.
Hitler took a country that already had industry, already had an intelligence, had scientists had the potential of having an economy and instead he used it for to play war, a war that cost him everything.
And for you white nationalists out there the soviet union was a mostly white nation and the old union counties remains to be to this day.
Germany on the other hand....well you know the story.
Hell even if being edgy is the only reason you want to like hitler, stalin was better at being edgy anyways. There is literally no reason to like hitler over stalin for any reason, whether it be accomplishments, "whiteness" or even edginess.
>>2119264
Adolf was charismatic, and very dramatic.(he should have been an actor)
he was basically the head cheerleader for Germanic supremacy, it's easy to see why people like him. plus him losing made him a martyr, and people love symbols.
Stalin, on the other hand was a cold-hearted 'son bitch.
>>2119264
Stalin was a very private person. He never was all too good at advertising himself, he gave his propagandists pretty much free reign.
That said, he still gets enough praise in Russia today to bemuse the rest of us.
>>2119264
stalin advanced his country through the death of millions, whereas hitler had a boring economic fix desu
>>2119486
>he should have been an actor
This. Maybe if his art had been better, he'd have been lucky enough to find a drama department at that art school.
>>2119264
>Genocides Ukrainian Christians
>Expects /pol/ to love him
Hitler was charismatic and,more edgy,really he was more.
Stalin was just a sociopath that just care for power,Hitler really care about Germany.And,Stalin never was racist,he just don't care of human life,if he had to kill awhole nation,what he do(Holodomor)but not because of race or some bullshit like that,he would do just because of the power.
And people put Hitler in the top because of the jews thing,someone that plan exterminate a whole race of people deserve to be on the top.
>>2119515
>a boring economic
It wasn't boring, it was super-risky. It hinged on him building his army fast enough to take the treasury of other, already militarized countries before bankers could cash out the state scurities that he was handing out like business cards.
>>2119264
Stalin was unironically a good guy, no edgelord goes for that.
>>2119588
Lol Joe killed all the hohols for their cows, now it's because they were Christians?
>IT WAS GENOCIDE I TELL YOU THE FACTS MEAN NOTHING
>>2119840
tips fedora