What version of the Holy Bible do you read, /his/?

>>2110750
https://www.biblegateway.com/versions/Russian-Synodal-Version-RUSV/

NIV because I'm not an autist

>>2110750

Original Hebrew.

File: Psalm 23.jpg (283KB, 736x1066px) Image search: [Google]

283KB, 736x1066px

>>2110750
The King's lad.

File: 1442812872040.png (65KB, 400x549px)

65KB, 400x549px

>>2111270
>וְהָיִיתָ לְשַׁמָּה, לְמָשָׁל וְלִשְׁנִינָה--בְּכֹל, הָעַמִּים, אֲשֶׁר-יְנַהֶגְךָ יְהוָה, שָׁמָּה.

>>2110750
The king James version pure Cambridge edition because it is perfect in the English language and is the word of God

>>2110750
RSV2CE. I'll probably get a Douay-Rheims at some point as well.

Jerusalem Bible

>>2110750

The original vinyl, you philistine

File: IMG_5502.jpg (36KB, 264x266px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 264x266px

King James on the Gameboy, the way God intended.

>>2110750

King James. I'm not a godfag, but I love the meter and rhythm of the KJV.

>>2110750
Is it thou shalt not kill or thou shalt not murder?

File: good bibles.png (1MB, 740x1154px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 740x1154px

>>2110750

>>2110750

What is the best version for a Roman Catholic? No, I do not speak Latin.

>>2111519

Not Kill

>>2111519
Either, but it doesn't mean killing full stop.

>>2111549
NJB (or NABRE if you're a burger)

>>2111549
Douay-Rheims for traditional English, it's based on the Latin Vulgate

RSVCE is nice

The Knox Bible is interesting as well, it's a newer translation (1950) based on the Vulgate

>>2111627
>gender neutral translations

Pleb af

>>2110750
I don't read the bible, I let my priest interpret it for me.

Currently working my way through the King James Version, because it's one of the major achievements of English literature and probably the most widely referenced. I plan to pick up the Oxford Annotated Bible when I eventually re-read the Bible.

File: Kike Bible.jpg (42KB, 337x500px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 337x500px

>>2110750
God-tier footnotes. currently in the process of rereading the OT ever since I found this in a used bookstore a few months ago.

I don't know how to read :(

File: gotchu fam.png (907KB, 686x713px)

907KB, 686x713px

>>2111726

>>2111549
get an OSB for that sick septuagint translation plus christological OT notes.

>>2111270
This for the Old Testament. Greek for the New Testament.

>>2111472
Goddamn it, I threw my back out a couple days ago and you made me laugh really hard. Fuck.

>>2110750
KJV when I want to hear some top quality English
NRSV for scholarly or academic endeavors

>>2110750
KJV

>>2111519
It says kill and means murder

>>2111700
G-d-tier*

>>2110750

KJV is fantastic

>>2112286

*wrong choice of words

succinctly magnificent

>Want to read Biblos
>Too many choices
>Don't read biblo
Fuck off.

>>2110750
New revised standard version

It's the standard academic translation

>ITT
>which non authentic fan fiction is most authentic?

As spaniard I use "Biblia de Jerusalén" (useful for the explanations and notes) and Reina Valera Contemporánea, that is really nice to read.

For the record...
NRSV flaws?

File: jesus.jpg (20KB, 231x346px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 231x346px

>>2110750
This one

File: 1445609862518.jpg (97KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 640x640px

>>2112413

Reminder that the Non-Inspired Version (NIV) was written by satan and you're not saved if you're believing in it.

>>2110750
The KJV is the infallible word of God

What is the best Bible version in German?

>>2112779
Lutherbibel

>>2110750
ESV is best translation

>>2110750
The one who tells the true story, it's called the Quran.

>>2114204
That's a funny way of spelling Bible.

Quran = real story

Kek

Quran plagiarized the Bible. Without no Bible, there would be no Quran.

>>2114210
>Quran plagiarized the Bible
Proofs?

>>2110750

New JKV

>>2114219

Read both.

>>2114241
I have. Still waiting for proofs

>>2114219
Not him, but the general narrative is taken from there, and the "special" details are taken from the apocrypha
http://www.answering-islam.org/Authors/Arlandson/apocryphal.htm
(inb4 >answering-islam
Yeah, i know, but it's the most comlete thing with serious sources i could find with a quick search on google)

>>2114296
>Not him, but the general narrative is taken from there
Nope. It can be said that it is inspired, but not plagiarized. Many of the Prophets have different details to their stories, not to mention many prophets not mentioned in the Bible and the completely different method of writing (and different language, for that matter)

Plagiarism isn't the correct word by any means

>>2114414
Fair enough.
The apocrypha are still super-plagiarised, though.

>>2114418
>The apocrypha are still super-plagiarised, though.
Again misusing the definition of plagiarism. I read your source--how would Muhammad, who we all agree was unlettered, be able to quote the specifics of the Arabic Infancy Gospel & the like, whilst his city was either pagan (Mecca) or Jewish (Yathrib/Medina)?

There are verses in the Quran which unapologetically 'plagiarize' from the OT and NT, but it is referenced in-text.

>>2114268

Were you born blind?

>>2114444
Nice quads. No, thank God, I have 20/20 vision. But insulting me isn't proving your stance on this.

>>2114414
Quranic verse 7:40 reads:-

Indeed, those who deny Our verses and are arrogant toward them – the gates of Heaven will not be opened for them, nor will they enter Paradise until a camel enters into the eye of a needle. And thus do We recompense the criminals.

Now compare it with Luke 18:25, which reads:-

For it is easier for a camel to go through a needle’s eye, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.

and, Matthew 19:24, which reads:-

And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.

Yeah, okay.

>>2114440

I have buddhist texts in my house.

I don't know any buddhists.

How is that possible?

>>2114440
Cultural osmosis from non-mainstream christian groups, which Arabia had no lack of, and cultural exchange via trade, basically(more or less succesfully, see Mary, the Trinity and Collyridianism).
He may have been illiterate, but he was smart.
The details presented in the Quran are too strikingly similar to, say, the Infancy Gospel, to be mere coincidences or inspiration.

>>2114449
Good, then you can read this: >>2114463

>>2114204
The one that says the bible is the Word of God, and Jesus is the Messiah.

And then says that Jesus is not God, as written in the book; that Jesus is not the Messiah, as written in the book; that Jesus did not die, as written in the book; that Jesus was not crucified, as written in the book; that Jesus did not rise from the dead, as written in the book.

Books that Mohammad had. And wrote about. Upon the whisperings of an angel, or at least one who could take the appearance of an angel of light, six centuries after the facts.

Sura 7:156-157:
"And I will write down (my mercy) for those who are righteous and give alms and who believe in our signs; who follow the apostle, the unlettered prophet, whom they find written in the Torah and the Gospel that is with them.

>>2114204
Sura 53:36:
"Nay is he not acquainted with what IS IN THE BOOKS OF MOSES."

Sura 5:46:
"But why do they (the Jews) come to thee for decision, when they have the Torah in which IS the command of God."

Sura 5:50:
"And let the People of the Gospel judge by what God has revealed in it. If any fail to judge by what God has revealed, they are licentious."

Sura 5:71:
"Say, O People of the Book! You are not (founded) on anything UNTIL you PERFORM the TORAH and the GOSPEL, and what was revealed to you from your Lord."

Sura 3:93-94:
"All food was lawful to the children of Israel except what Israel made unlawful for itself before the Torah was revealed. Say, `BRING the TORAH and READ it, if you are men of truth.' If any, after this, invent a lie and attribute it to God, they are indeed transgressors."

>>2114204
Sura. 28:48-49:
"But when the truth has come to them from Us, they say: `why is he not given the like of what was given to Moses?' Did they not disbelieve in that which was given to Moses before? They say: `Two kinds of magic (the Torah and the Quran) each helping the other!' And they say: `Verily! In both we are disbelievers.' Say (to them, O Muhammad): `Then bring a Book from Allah, which is a better guide than these TWO (the Torah and the Quran), that I may follow it, if you are truthful.'"

Remark: Notice how Muhammad is commanded to defend both the Quran and the Torah of Moses that was available to him as a guidance from God. No mention of textual corruption whatsoever.

Sura 32:23:
"We did indeed aforetime give the Book to Moses: Be not then in doubt of its REACHING (THEE): And we made it a guide to the Children of Israel."

These verses presuppose that an uncorrupted Torah and Gospel exist which both Jews and Christians are commanded to study and adhere to.

>>2114468
Well you live in the 21st century and are literate, from what I can gather. It makes sense you have an ease of acquiring Buddhist texts, but you don't also have the Herculean task of being illiterate and having to make religious poetry and somehow being able to plagiarize without someone reciting Gospel to you, and therefore accusing you of plagiarism, ending your whole relgion.

>>2114463
Allow me to type the tafsir (interpretation) of that verse from "The Study Quran" by Sayyed Hossein Nasr:

>The image of the camel passing through the eye of the needle is a metaphor for something so difficult as to be impossible and is similarly used in the Gospel (Matt. 19:24, Mark 10:25, Luke 18:25). Camel here translates to jamal, and many commentators consider the term to mean exactly that. Some, however, note that the term could be read as juml, meaning a thick cable woven of many strands, such is used to secure ships.

>Some Biblical commentaries, such as the Geneva Study Bible, similarly suggest that the term "camel" in the Gospel account may reefer to a thick cable, although most indicate that the image of a camel (or in some cases, an elephant) passing through the eye of the needle was a *well-known metaphor*

The metaphor predated the NT. Are you accusing Jesus of plagiarism? Or perhaps we are in agreement that its an apt and beautiful metaphor describing the difficulty of the Herculean task of reaching Paradise.

>>2112386
>not reading the bible purely for enjoyment

>>2114540

Are you trying to tell me that the quran was written before Mohammad died?

Because that is not what Islam teaches.

Islam teaches that 4 men had memorized the quran, and in the war for succession after Mohammad died, one of those men was killed. The rest realized they had better reduce it to writing before the other 3 died too, and all of Mohammad's nonsense was lost. And then one of those men wrote what we now call the quran, and Mohammad's ruthless successor brutally eliminated everyone and everything that did not agree with his decision.

Do you not believe the official story?

Do you not believe the official hadith?

>>2114497
>>2114508
>>2114511
>"But on account of their breaking their covenant We cursed them and made their hearts hard; they altered the words from their places and they neglected a portion of what they were reminded of; and you shall always discover treachery in them excepting a few of them; so pardon them and turn away; surely Allah loves those who do good (to others). And with those who say, We are Christians, We made a covenant, but they neglected a portion of what they were reminded of, therefore We excited among them enmity and hatred to the day of resurrection; and Allah will inform them of what they did. O followers of the Book! indeed Our Messenger has come to you making clear to you much of what you concealed of the Book and passing over much; indeed, there has come to you light and a clear Book from Allah;
Quran 5:13-15

It is undeniable that Noah and Moses and Abraham and Jesus Christ, blessed be their names, however considering them as prophets is simply not plagiarism. Islam teaches that by some form, the texts have been distorted from the original meaning (it is hotly debated on whether it is by translation, or by human manipulation, but nevertheless the Quran supercedes both the OT and NT in Islam.

Hearkening to what came before (the stories of the Prophets) is hardly plagiarism, and you desperately need to google the definition of plagiarism, because the Jews can accuse the Christians of plagiarism by that same logic.

>>2114540

It's evidence of the quran copying from the bible, and not just from the apocrypha, and not just from the gnostic gospels, and not just from the infancy gospels.

Although those heresies did find their place in the "eternal" quran.

When are you going to realize that Mohammad was lied to be satan?

When are you going to realize that satan wants to be worshiped as god?

And fyi, in the bible, the eye of the needle and the camel are quite literal, and meant to convey something that is impossible. Hence the despair of the apostles upon hearing it, as they thought rich people were blessed by God.

>>2114578
>but nevertheless the Quran supercedes both the OT and NT in Islam.

And nowhere else.

>>2114570
>Are you trying to tell me that the quran was written before Mohammad died?
Where on earth did you get that from?

No, I am calling into question *how* Muhammad would have even gone about plagiarizing the OT and NT without anyone noticing. He couldn't read the Arabic gospel for inspiration, so he'd have to have someone read it to him, and there are no accounts of tat happening, as it would be plain to everyone that it was plagiarised. And to what end?

>>2114580
>>2114588
I see you're out of arguments. Shame. Well, God bless and have a merry Christmas.

>>2114469
Islam does not insist it is bringing anything new to the table. It insists that it is the primordial monotheism, in that it does not preach racial superiority (as the Jews do), nor does it ascribe details/partners to God (as the Christians do).

Muhammad would have to be one of the smartest men alive to not only memorize Biblical narratives without formal education and living in a pagan town, but would have to make it rhythmic and poetic as the Quran is. And why? At the advent of his prophethood, he was heavily persecuted by the natives. Only until a decade later, he began to live comfortably, towards the latter part of his life.

>>2114578
>Islam teaches that by some form, the texts have been distorted from the original meaning (it is hotly debated on whether it is by translation, or by human manipulation
The Monk--Do not say something you can't prove, because, in the end, you will be ashamed, like that one who prefers to cover the sunlight. Tell me, Abu-Salamah, how many years had passed from the Christ until Mohammed?

The Moslem-- I don't know.

The Monk-- I give the answer: from the Christ to Mohammed, six hundred and some more years passed.

The Prince--You're right, Monk. That is what we found in the history.

The Monk-- Were the Christians, then, in the whole world?

The Moslem-- Yes, they were.

The Monk-- Like in the present time?

The Moslem--Yes and more (then they are now).

The Monk-- Could you count (the number of ) the Gospels which existed (in that time) on the earth (in the world) in various languages?

The Moslem-- We couldn't.

The Monk-- Let us suppose that some people in the West had altered their Gospels. So, how did they reach those who are at the end of the earth in the East? Same thing for those who are in the North towards the South. It's impossible. If that was possible you were, then, founding the apocryphal Gospels with a part of Christians. While if you pay for a trip over the whole world, you will find the Gospels in various languages analogous to those received from the Apostles of our Lord the Christ. No difference between any of them, even in one letter, except the particular traits of each language. I, hereby, give you an example which lets you believe me: If someone comes and shows a Koran different from that known to you now, and says, " this is the Koran inspired by the Prophet," while it is not, will you accept it?

The Prince-- No, on the contrary we shall kill him and burn his book.

>>2114666
You know it took decades after Christ died for the NT to formulate? Not to mention much longer for the spread of Christianity. Or, the fact the original Aramaic Jesus spoke wasn't the "Biblical" language instead of Koine Greek?

Perhaps the NT was never truly told properly.

>>2114595

You're telling me Mo was illiterate.

I'm saying Mo did not read or write the quran.

We are saying the same things.

>>2114637
And yet, if you're not a native Arabic speaking muslim from birth, your "understanding" of the quran can never be correct.

I'd say that's pretty racially specific.

>>2111277
>Vowels
for what purpose

>>2114696
Not really. You're saying he plagiarized it, and I'm asking you how that's feasible. You've yet to answer satisfactorily.

>>2114699
Arabic can be learned, like the Jews learn Hebrew. Plus many different peoples, from the Levant to Africa, speak Arabic as a first language. And they are ethnically different, don't let the Pan-Arabism meme fool you. Ethnic superiority has no place in religion

>>2111285

>Written by a Homosexual

>>2114694

And perhaps it was.

>>2114704
I said the quran plagiarized the bible.

The bible was finished 5 centuries before Mohammad.

I showed you a verse found on a quick google search of quran copying verses from the bible.

You still insist on holding onto your lies.

>>2114718
And God knows best. So let's leave our religions to one another and hope we do right by our respective consciences--I think that's a modus operandi which is unfortunately severely underrated, especially in the Muslim world.

File: 163644499.jpg (53KB, 400x577px)

53KB, 400x577px

Started reading the bible two days ago, mostly because I want to get a grasp on the bible to better understand western literature.

My autism made me choose KJV though because it's 1337 epic maymay cool bro, but being a non native English speaker, it's a bit difficult at times. I'm sure it'll be fine though.

Got fucking surprised that the New Testament is like 1/6th of the Bible though, I always thought it was about half. Also a bit surprised that some of the major themes in the bible that I knew about without ever reading the bible- such as God destroying those cities and Abraham sacrificing his son- were so short. In movies and such, they all seemed so intriquete and developed so I had assumed they would be several pages long.

Not too long into the bible though, still in Genesis. Second time i'm gonna try and get through the bible.

>>2114694
Aye.
>Perhaps the NT was never truly told properly.
Then Allah's religion died in its cradle?
Which is weird since even far-flung reaches of Christendom like India, pretty much have the same things, even for minute stuff, and the first mention of christians ever says they considered Jesus divine.

>>2114704

Again, and from hundreds of discussions, and thousands of years of study, when you show a muslim that sperm does not come from your ribcage, they say that you do not understand the original native Arabic quran, and that the original native Arabic quran somehow explains how sperm comes from your ribcage.

This isn't my first rodeo. I know taqiyya when I see it.

>>2114732

God gave his best. His name is Jesus. And instead of worshiping Jesus as God, you have demeaned him and placed him at a low level with the servant Moses.

You and I can go our separate ways and never meet, but the truth is obtainable.

>>2114721
And I refuted it as it was apparently a common metaphor prior to both books' revelation. The rest were saying "See? They have Moses and Abraham too, so therefore it's plagiarism," which is the Jews' logic for the "goys' false religions" so it's a rather baseless argument.

Why are we playing recap?

>>2114733
Godspeed.

>>2114742

You attempted to refute it, but without citing anything from prior to 32 AD making it "common".

Lies are just lies; they don't refute the truth. They just try to hide it.

>>2114734
Way to completely avoid the first part of what I've said. Is this Christian taqiyya?

>>2114736
I've read the Quran several times over, I don't recall the sperm coming from the ribcage. Perhaps you're confusing the 'alaq in the story of Adam? I'm happy to discuss it with you if you show the verse in question.

>>2114741
I admire your love for Christ, but that does not diminish the great role of Moses, nor his greatness in God's eyes.

>>2114746
I cited the Geneva Study Bible. I don't have a copy, I'm on my phone atm (running an errand) so i can't exactly google it in an adequate timeframe

However, it is plain to all that it is a metaphor. Besides, if by invoking prior scripture is plagiarism, then Christ plagiarized the Old Law by invoking it several times in the NT (God forbid such a notion)

>>2114753
I don't expect you to have it memorized.

You could look it up though.

86:6-7 He is created from a drop emitted - proceeding from between the backbone and the ribs.

The Law came through the servant Moses. Grace and Truth came by the Son, Jesus.

And the servant does not abide in the house forever.

>>2114762

The Geneva bible barely preceded the KJV.

I'm talking about preceding the story told from 32 AD.

>>2114762
>However, it is plain to all that it is a metaphor.

It's not a metaphor at all. It's quite literal. And even if it's a metaphor for something that's literally impossible, it conveys the same meaning.

A rich man cannot enter into heaven (without God's assistance) any more than a camel could pass through the eye of a needle.

>>2114776
There was no eye of the needle gate in Jerusalem though, which leads us to believe that was edited in.

>>2114789

Eye of a sewing needle.

>But's it's impossible to get a camel through the eye of a sewing needle!

Yes, I know.

>>2114753
>Way to completely avoid the first part of what I've said.
Aye, i believe it took decades.
But the underlying letters existed since 50AD and were universally accepted(except Revelations)
But some of the sees were founded by the apostles in remote locations, and developed in semi-isolation.
For something like that to happen in all the far-flung corners, without any sort of opposition to it, would be supremely odd.

>>2114768
Ah I see wherein the confusion lies. You're treating the latter verse as descriptive of the "fluid," not the man created by it.

The fluid was what became you, but you "emerge" via pregnancy, meaning you emerge from your mother's belly.

>>2114771
>>2114776
My point is that reusing a metaphor is hardly plagiarism (And it is a metaphor). I cited a Christian work to say that it was a common phrasing at the time. I don't know the information gathering method/quality of it but it certainly is less biased than either of us are.

>>2114805
With the Council of Nicaea and meetings like it, a centralized Church, Christianity being spearheaded by Rome and the like. It is incredibly believable. The fact that none of the words in the NT are truly Christ's spoken word, but a translation, also lends to its unreliability.

And there have been many oppositions, not to the validity of the Bible, which is why things like Nestorianism and Arianism were deemed heresies and stamped out by the Church.

>>2110750
Reminder that the old testament is just rehashed sumerian kyths with metaphorical "really makes you think" stories made to enforce moral values and/or tell early history

File: I don't think so buddy.jpg (32KB, 600x404px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 600x404px

>>2114204

I really like Reina Valera but it doesn't have all the Catholic books. What a shame.

>>2111788
You're so full of shit, you don't know either of those languages you sperg.
>inb4 google

File: Thomas-Davies-cover.jpg (27KB, 323x500px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 323x500px

This is the one I keep coming back to.

>>2115144
but that just makes it better

File: Cieling_cat_creates.jpg (180KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 800x600px

>>2110750
Lolcat:
http://lolcatbible.com/index.php?title=Genesis_1

>>2111565
Nope. No Murder. Murder is never justified but killing can be.

File: 1479145705607.jpg (43KB, 500x376px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 500x376px

>>2112413

File: image.png (140KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 500x500px

>>2111285
>>2111472
>>2111485
>>2111943
>>2111978
>>2112286
>>2112721
>>2114733
KJV was a fine Bible, but it is not the word of God.

The RSV is based on ancient Bible manuscripts closest to the time of Jesus(or Disciples), closer than the KJV.

Now, 32 Christian Biblical scholars backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations remove the Trinity verse(John 5:7)

there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost, and these three are one.

As history tell us, this Trinity verse contradicts 1 Corinthians 14:33:

33 For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.

So either one of these are a fabrication, because they both cannot be right. In this case, it is the Trinity verse.

So, any of you have anything to say? Remember, the most intellect among of you Christians took out this verse.

File: image.png (248KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 750x1334px

>>2115624
Oh, and read the pic related.

I got banned if any of you knew me.

>>2115624
What I'm trying to say is the word of God shouldn't have any contradiction in it, agree?

File: bible_contraditions.png (2MB, 3327x4418px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3327x4418px

>>2115624
Yay, you fixed the one contradiction not even on the list.

The contradictions are there for a reason though, if you start axing them out you're going to lose a lot of of the text's functionality towards self-perpetuating staying power.

>>2115640
I got no idea what's your saying.

You mean the God's word contradict itself? Does that make God a liar.

What do you mean it not on the list?

>>2115646
*doesn't that mean it

>>2112388
Get the fuck out of my country, prot.

t, Spaniard

>>2116303
Get the fuck out of my country, Christian

t. Andalusian

>>2112721
why did this version attract such a following?
how do you know it is 'infallible' compared to other versions?

File: image.png (962KB, 800x480px) Image search: [Google]

962KB, 800x480px

>>2114210
Let's be fair, according to your logic, then Jesus also plagiarize Moses.

(NT)Mark 12:29:

29 “The most important one,” answered Jesus, “is this: ‘Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the LORD IS ONE."

(OT)Deuteronomy 6:4:

Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one.

So, in conclusion, the New Testament plagiarized the Old Testament, Jesus plagiarized Moses, right?

No, we all knew that Moses and Jesus are inspired by the same God. And Prophet Muhammab pbuh is also inspired by the same God.

Quran 112:1
Say, "He is Allah , [who is] One,"

Are they plagiarized each other? No. They're inspired by the same God.

>>2114109
only correct answer in the whole thread

>>2111628
>Douay-Rheims

The one that makes Mary the messiah.

Pass.

>>2114816

Taqiyya

Taqiyya

Taqiyya

Face it. The writers of the quran did not know embryology.

He was created from a fluid, ejected,
ﭨﭩﭪﭫ

Emerging from between the backbone and the ribs.

ﭮﭯﭰﭱﭭ

>>2115361
It's garbage. Women have to be turned into men before they can be saved?

Garbage.

>>2115640

473 lies that have all been refuted.

>>2116874

The Holy Spirit inspired the entire bible, and so you could hardly say that the Holy Spirit stole from the Holy Spirit.

>>2116874
>They're inspired by the same God.

Jehovah loves the Jews.
Allah hates them.

Jehovah is a triune being; Father, Son and Spirit.
Allah is not.

Jehovah has a son, Jesus.
Allah has no children.

Jehovah is Love.
Allah is the supreme trickster and deceiver.

Sound the same to you?

Reminder that you can only be saved by reading the KJV or the Luther translation if you read German. All Catholics that believed in the vulgata for hundreds of years are now in hell.

>>2118704
>taking any of it literally
>despite the opening lines explicitly stating to find the hidden meanings of the sayings
Retard.

>>2110750
RSV

NRSV is laid out a bit nicer but the gender-neutral shit is just poor translation practice.

>>2111546
>ignatius

Mah nigger

>>2118736
>>2118711
>>2118708
>>2118706
samefag

>>2118867
It's gnostic garbage that has nothing to do with Christianity, written centuries later and not by the apostle Thomas.

>>2119158
lrn2samefag. Your cancer is showing.

I'm the last three, not the first one.

>>2119134
I read the NRSV. Where are the gender neutral elements?

>>2119178
>I'm the last three
kek
3 out of 4 ain't bad

File: image.jpg (259KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 1920x1200px

>>2118711
Anon, stop. Be nice. Remember what your Bible said:

>God die
>God went to hell
>God was circumcised
>Lot committed incest with his daughters (Genesis 19:31-35)
>Prophet Isaiah walk naked for three years(Isaiah 20:3)

LOL XD

>>2119175
>centuries later
At latest it was written in the 2nd century, and at earliest at the same time as the synoptics. There are arguments for both cases, which is why it's still being debated today.

>>2118708
You mean the Holy Spirit that inspired ten of thousands different Churches and denomination? Leading all of them different paths? Instead of ONE path? That Holy Spirit?

Christians pla

File: 340.jpg (19KB, 410x410px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 410x410px

Why cant you fags realize abrahamic religions are retarded and accept the brightest light of the most holy, Kek?

File: ....jpg (57KB, 522x325px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 522x325px

>>2119400
PRAISE HIM

>>2119400
Praise

>>2119400
What religion/belief are you? I'll roast it to the motherfucking ground motherfucker.

kjv, esv, nasb, rsv, nlt - all are good in different ways. Translation of words is limited; there must be cultural understanding too, etc, etc...

>>2120307
He worships an internet meme, he's so deep in shame he is practically impervious to any more.

>>2120334
None feel shame praising Lord Kek's name.

I have truly seen no gods' light but the glory that is Kek's.

Praise Kek

File: take_me_Jesus.jpg (103KB, 576x717px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 576x717px

>>2110750
>>2120328

This is the correct answer