The protestant dogma of sola scriptura (i.e., considering the bible the unique authority) can't be sustained logically in any way.
Where did they take the basis for that dogma?
If from the bible itself, then it is circular reasoning ("I believe Edgar Allan Poe's tales are true because the tales themselves say they are".
If from outside the bible, then it is a contradiction ("I consider the bible the only authority because tradition told me to do so").
If you come with some ad hoc argument, like, "I believe the bible is the only authority because of FAITH", then it is still illogical, because using the faith as criterion of truth either comes from the bible (circular reasoning) or form outside (contradiction).
>protestant
>logic
Literally "muh feels: the religion".
Humanities was a mistake.
>>2108276
I think Jesus Christ is a authority figure, but this is made through abductive reasoning and not deductive.
I see the ethics and divine justice he posited to be revolutionary and brilliant.
This supports the claim that he is Divine.
"My sheep hear my voice."
>>2108607
Bur how does that support Sola scriptura?