Unbiased opinions on women's achievements throughout history?

WE WUZ KUWEENZ N SHIET

probably plant domestication (horticulture) was started by women

Females were the first tellers of time because of their monthly cycles

Women invented the art of whoredom.

>Did women actually invent and create stuff throughout history, and if not, why?

Are you retarded? Apparently so, because otherwise you would know how to Google and get the answer to your question.

Yes, women invented things. Yes, women created things. Neither one of those is the EXACT TRUE NOTHING ELSE CAN BE TRUE BUT THESE TWO EXAGGERATED STATEMENTS.

First novel was written in Animeland by a woman.

They weren't really players in anything besides politics for a long time, East or West.

>>2100031
>Did women actually invent and create stuff throughout history, and if not, why?
They did, but not as much as men.
NEXT!

Women didn't contribute big things like architecture and astronomy or any inventions. They contributed by raising children and taking care of the home front, which is equally as important

>talks about wanting unbiased opinions
>already lays out a biased question
Since when are those the only two possibilities OP? Because clearly there are more and also less retarded ones.

Yes, they did. No, not as much as men. This is obvious to anyone.

Women did invent things, contribute to science and engineering and all of those things, just to a lesser extent than men, partially because their traditional role in society does not encourage this.

File: Female Authors.jpg (2MB, 2300x4000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2300x4000px

>>2100211

>>2100214
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_women_philosophers#By_period

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_women_writers

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_20th-century_women_artists

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_female_composers_by_birth_date

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_women_architects

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_female_film_and_television_directors

women didn't do much because they were oppressed

>>2100161
Thread should have ended here.

Wow! It's Fucking Nothing: The thread.

Women didn't exist before the 20th century

File: 1480734027854.png (314KB, 702x366px) Image search: [Google]

314KB, 702x366px

>>2100031
Grouping people by class in any context is silly

Show me an individual woman and I will judge her achievements. I don't know who this "Women" is, I've never met someone named "Women".

>>2100249
Women were oppressed because they didnt do much

>>2100101
there's zero actual evidence for this. Anthropologists like to assume this based on how hunter-gatherer societies operate today, where the men take care of meat and the women harvest plants. but as always the trouble with using them as exemplars is that unlike the prehistoric societies we're comparing them too, they didn't develop agriculture, so its questionable how good of an example they can be.

>>2100031
Clearly they didn't do as much as men but there have always existed rare examples of women far more talented and able than the average man.

File: Nietzscheonwomencooking.jpg (53KB, 873x241px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 873x241px

>>2100031

>>2100031
Why does it matter? Gender is a social construct my dude. The human race created everything, you womyn can't steal credit.

>>2100031
public vs. domestic spheres holy shit it really not that hard like jesus christ

>>2101449
>Not only did Nietzsche purchase fruit from the inn and from local Italian vendors, but he received baskets of fruit shipped to him by his friends as well. This wasn’t a small amount of fruit. Rather, on more than one occasion, Nietzsche ate almost three kilograms (6.5 lbs) of fruit during the course of a single day
t. fruitman