Two spooks.

Going around declaring only certain ideologies a spook is a spook

>>2095167
Racial inequality is a spook.
Gender inequality is a spook.
Spooks are a spook.
>tfw spooks all the way down

>>2095169
Those are concepts, not full blown ideologies.

Fucking psychological dead end. Egoism is literally the gibsmedat of philosophy.

>>2095167
Equality of anything is silly
It is unattainable and unfounded anywhere in nature.

What do you mean by equality? Nobody believes men and women or different races are identical.

>>2095167
>Racial equality is a spook.
>Gender equality is a spook.
wym?

>>2095810
I think he means the ideal, which is why we are arguing about spooks.

>>2095823

What ideal?

NOBODY thinks equal means identical. It's only mooted by people who oppose legal and civil rights for certain citizens based on race or gender.

>>2095833
Ideal, as in, something you strive for.

>>2095167
What did OP meant by that? That sexism and racism are still a thing?

>>2095844

So what is the ideal you are talking about?

>>2095833

These legal/civil rights are fueled by spooks.

Gaps in positive life outcomes aren't necessarily evidence of an unequal system. But these ideologues will blindly point to any disparity as some injustice.

By this logic the whole of the U.S is titled in the favor of Ashkenazi Jews. How can 2% of the country make up 48% of billionaires? All of their absurd flabbergasting over-representations must be the result of an unequal system, their IQs have nothing to do with it.

>>2095855
The ideal that you should try to treat different people the same, I assume. Again, I'm giving you my intrepretation of OP's post.

Before you get mad, remember we are discussing this within Stirner's framework.

>>2095857
>These legal/civil rights are fueled by spooks.

Which spook? Nobody believes that different genders and races are identical. You'll have to explain why citizens should be ranked according to what rights they deserve, and how they should be ranked.

>Gaps in positive life outcomes aren't necessarily evidence of an unequal system. But these ideologues will blindly point to any disparity as some injustice.

So long as people with better life outcomes get more of a say in the policies that affect life outcomes, we have to assume it is.

>By this logic the whole of the U.S is titled in the favor of Ashkenazi Jews. How can 2% of the country make up 48% of billionaires? All of their absurd flabbergasting over-representations must be the result of an unequal system, their IQs have nothing to do with it.

High Ashkenazi IQ is a myth. They scored higher on tests a half century ago, they tended to get a better education than average, but not today.

>>2095871
>High Ashkenazi IQ is a myth. They scored higher on tests a half century ago, they tended to get a better education than average, but not today.

The more traditional ones may have brought the median down, but ti's still above the white mean by about 10. Their history is an adequate explanation of that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7R-hTToDRzs&index=148&list=FLsnmALu1ikFmecHWCxav7Qg

>>2095888

Education adequately explains it.

>>2095171
>black people have on average more muscle density
>this is somehow not real

hmmmmmmmmmmmmm

>>2095167
equality is spook

File: 1.jpg (118KB, 1912x895px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1912x895px

>>2095896
>Education adequately explains it.

>"muh education"

>>2095805
Kek this is pretty true

>>2095896

Not him. But Black and White Americans with the same formal level of education differ significantly in their cognitive abilities. Specifically, within any given level of formal education Whites consistently outperform Blacks. Moreover, this effect is so strong that Blacks often underperform Whites who have lower levels of formal education than they do.

Source: national center for education statistics
https://nces.ed.gov/pubs93/93275.pdf

File: nietzsche_glasses.jpg (10KB, 224x251px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 224x251px

Free will is the biggest spook there is. Even bigger, dare I say it, than god.

>>2095167
>Racial inequality & equality are spooks.
>Gender inequality &equality are spooks.
ftfy

>>2095916
>>2095950

Significantly?

We'll see when they actually receive the same start and the same support.

The Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study showed that they match white children until they are informed they are black and black people are less capable.

>>2095967
>We'll see when they actually receive the same start and the same support.
You have 10 seconds to explain why black people are universally like this.

Even if places like Germany where the state bends over backwards to support them they are put to shame by the white man.

>>2095167
More like
>race is a spook
>gender is a spook

If actually read him then maybe you wouldn't look like such an idiot you memeing cretin

>>2095916
The standard deviation is 15, between individuals.

>>2096009
Any two random individuals, I mean.

>>2095999
Race and gender are not spooks, they're immutable biological facts.

Of course according to Stirner they would be. But this is because egoism ironically is post-Christian Hegelian nonsense.

>>2095167
is that what your frustrated emotions are telling you?

>>2096023
DEFINE "POST-CHRISTIAN".

>>2096023
>Race isn't a spook
>Can't even define race in a way that contains all people of one race, excludes all people of another race

>>2096033
Acknowledges that Christianity has passed, but continues to uphold inexplicitly Christian concepts.

Most fundamentally free will. But I suppose that's more generally post-religious than post-Christian.

>>2096043
White people are the ones with whiteish skin
Black people are the ones with blackish skin.

QED.

>>2096062

Regardless of their heritage.

wtf i love nazism now

>>2095167
>Racial equality is a spook.
>Gender equality is a spook.
True.

Still, Stirner never said you can't use spooks as useful tools. If either of them are within the egoist's self-interest, pursuing them isn't spooked (unless they are pursuing them because it's the 'right' thing to do or something like that).

>>2095167
Don't spook yourself by caring about race and gender.

>>2095904
racial categories are spooks, doubly so when they're based on absurd criteria like hypodescent ("one drop rule")

File: 1436548064162-0.png (73KB, 800x1745px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 800x1745px

>>2095805

Daily reminder that spooks are not necessarily bad, and they were the primary tool utilized by elite throughout history to drive the public to work for them. Many plebs trusted a god-emperor, and many serfs fervently believed in a king's divine power, and many citizens put faith into nationalism when their country went to war. If you oppose all spooks, you likely support either primitivism, in which case, you will die, or the education of all people on the nature of spooks, in which case, good luck educating all of humanity, or fighting against all of humanity with your spook-opposing ideology.

Spooks are fine as long as you recognize that they are spooks.

>>2095167
Race and gender themselves are also spooks.

>>2096043
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henderson_Island_(Pitcairn_Islands)

> wood re-discovered the skeletons in March 1958, a medical examination determined that the bones were of Caucasian origin, and they were then buried in a shallow grave inside the cave.

>>2096043
>if categories aren't discrete, then theyre exactly the same

the nuance of the post-modernist ladies and gents

What's a spook

>>2095167
Equality in general is a spook.
Only non-spook is freedom

>>2097430
>Hasnt read Stirner where it directly says freedom can be spooky as fuck.

>>2095167
Racism is a spook
Gender is a spook
it goes both ways

>>2097409

Read stirner

Define spook.

>>2096062
people who have yet to google albino african

>>2095167
So is their inherent disparity though. They're just categories that divide influence. If you REALLY wanted and had the millenia to waste you COULD create perfectly equal versions of all categories.

>>2098011
Everything.

>>2097430
Freedom is most certainly a spook unless you'd care to define it for us.

>>2098011
social construct, but thats sjw language so they use 'spook' here