Landslides

Hard to say, Anon.

I'd go with FDR. Johnson was facing down Goldwater, a man before his time (for good or ill). Mondale smashed himself. Nixon is second best.

>>2074101
Honestly none of these are impressive, established popular candidates running against literal who's or people who were extremely unpopular (Barry Goldwater) and winning decisively isn't hard. I would say winning a close race or coming back after being written off takes a lot more effort. That said the LBJ's victory really hurt the GOP so I'm going to go with that one.

How would Trumps rate here?

>>2074101
Washington, largest landslide in US history.

>>2074169
It wouldn't, he didn't win a landslide

>>2074169
>Not winning at least 50% of the vote

Below average tbqh

>>2074169
306 T, 232 C isn't a landslide.

It's impressive given the whole "outsider candidate beating the candidate who embodies the establishment" thing but it's certainly not a landslide.

>>2074172
But only Maryland allowed the popular vote for its electors
>bigot

File: 1792-election-map[1].png (40KB, 582x572px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 582x572px

>which landslide was the most impressive
>any answer that isn't largest % of electoral vote

laughing_washington.jpg

>>2074101
>tfw you will never see a landslide again.

>>2074182
This

>>2074129
Why was Goldwater before his time?

>>2074301
Also, forgot to say, all aspects combined it seems Nixon was the biggest landslide.

>>2074301
Goldwater was a free-trade supporting neolib in a New Deal coalition world. If he was born twenty years later he would have swept 1980.

>>2074346
>If he was born twenty years later he would have swept 1980.
Or today and ran democrat.