who would win? conor mcgregor or romes best gladiator?
>>2071889
In what kind of fight?
no weapons: Probably Connor if the gladiator isn't a heavyweight with some kind of ancient wrestling training.
weapons: Gladiator
There's also other questions. Is the gladiator wearing a helmet? That left won't work against a helmet.
>>2071910
no helmets. dagger optional.
>>2071919
Gladiator would win.
>>2071953
really? why?
>>2071960
he knows how to fight with a dagger professionally
>>2071968
probably shitly though. reckon mcgregor can give him a run with his reach and boxing skills.
>>2071889
the lions
>>2071968
This.
Not to mention that he has likely been in an armed fight before.
David
Nah, Conor McGregor trained UFC, kid.
The "gladiators" had no jujitsu, no stand up game, no wrestling, literally nothing.
One punch from the God King Conor "Two Weight Division Champion of the World" McGregor would send Achilles and the Greco-Roman gods straight to Hades.
>>2071978
u a luke cukchold fan innit?
>>2071994
yeah i reckon mcgregor could fuck em up. khabib for sure.
>>2071972
top gladiator was probably a 6'6, 250lb beast that knew how to fight pretty well with most common weapons. Daggers were something you carried everywhere, stands to reason he'd be trained with them
meanwhile McGregor fights at 145 and is 5'9
The guy with reach, weight, and training is gonna win
>>2072005
come on lets atleast assume same size.
>>2071889
bang.
>>2072007
rome's best gladiator isn't gonna be a featherweight
>>2072118
well what about romes best featherweight.
>>2072196
>what about I change my shitty question until I get the answer I want
>>2072196
Greco-Roman wrestling didn't have weight classes, there were no wrestlers who were that small
Gladiators were likely the same, no point in training a small person who would be harder to see from the stands and easily overpowered by the larger gladiators of other ludi
>>2072206
what about you make a useful contribution or shut the fuck up.
so what if i change the question. surely these forums are about getting to the truth in whatever way necessary. except maybe fo you that just loves shitposting.
>>2072005
Size is not that big of a deal in fighting.
One clean punch from McGregor would floor any Roman, no matter how big and fat he is.
>>2072276
do you think that mcgregor could beat jon jones or brock lesnar?
>>2072284
Easily. The light heavyweights and heavyweights are too slow, they won't even touch em. They lack the timing, the rhythm, the flow, and mewments. They'd trip over their fat legs before they could lay a finger on em.
>>2072293
yeah, everyone knows Muhammad ali was slow af
>>2072293
Look how fragile Conor looked sparring with a UNTRAINED The mountain
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aaehn1aY8Ig
>>2072314
somehow i dont believe you lol.
Unarmed mcgregor would wreck anyone up to 6 foot 2, above that with plenty of muscle on the other guy he would be destroyed. Look up the game of thrones guy vs mcgregor there is a point where size is too big an issue
>>2072326
he barely beat diaz. very close match. diaz could have beat him. you are deluded my friend.
>>2071889
Those bums got nutin
I think you have to account for lifestyles too.
Even if the Roman is smaller i bet you a dime to a dollar that the Roman or gual or Semite lived an extremely hardcore life compared to anyone alive today let alone a ufc fighter.
>>2072336
I am drunk and you type like an arab
>>2071972
If you give a child a knife he would become a threat to a pro fighter.
give a knife to someone who trains to fight professionally with them and they will take apart just about anyone