What are your thoughts on an age of humans preceding this one? Evidence at Nabta Playa, H20 weathering of Sphinx etc?
>>2066683
Why do you think they were humans? The Sphinx in particular was built by lion people.
Civilizations leave evidence.
Pottery, sudden replacement of indigenous flora and fauna with domesticated species, worked metal items.
We have evidence of stone tools progressively getting better and better until the neolithic revolution.
It wouldn't make sense that genuine civilizations existed without domesticating animals, firing clay, or forging metal.
>>2066683
what is your picture supposed to be. surely this belongs on /x/ too?
>>2066712
It wouldn't make sense to humans*
>>2066683
Nabta Playa is a part of the greater Aqualithic of Northern Africa. I have a thread discussing the Neolithic Subpluvial here
>>2066808
Well OP did say an age of humans
no evidence, and because of how recently it would have had to have been, the absence of evidence in this case is evidence of absence. they would have had to have an active agenda to remove evidence of their existence to have existed.
it's more possible that there was an intelligent species millions of years before humans, as evidence of their civilization would have long been destroyed geologically. there is little reason to speculate on this, though.
>>2066683
They were compromised with foreign DNA so that only one family on earth was pure human.
We're getting pretty close to the same exact condition.
>As in the days of Noah....
>>2066840
This is a valid explanation of their creation, but I feel at this point in our current age of human development i.g. global culture, potential for interplanetary travel, that it is of critical importance what happened to the last culture of creatures on this planet capable of calculating 26,000 years of celestial time.
>>2066874
I wouldn't trust people off 20 parts in 26.