If by "the Pope" you mean "Joseph P. Kennedy", then yes.
It's crazy how much of an abusive tyrant JFK's father was to his kids. JFK never wanted to enter politics, he just wanted to be a sports columnist; but once his older brother was killed in WWII, Joe put the responsibility of becoming America's "first Catholic president" on the next in line. JFK figuratively had no choice in the matter.
Also the Kennedy family differed in religiosity. While Robert took Catholicism very seriously, Jack was aloof to it, and even considered renouncing it entirely just to spite his bootlegging dad.
>>2058631
Nah mate he shook the Pope's hand not suck his dick
>>2058631
Kennedy took orders from plenty of people, namely his dearest family. He was a rich boy through and through. But he was notoriously hard to control, and many theories speculate that he was assassinated because of it.
The theory of him "taking orders from the Pope" was invented by angry Americans trying to bash the first Catholic President in typical Evangelical protestant fashion. Total fiction.
>>2058740
>The theory of him "taking orders from the Pope" was invented by angry Americans trying to bash the first Catholic President in typical Evangelical protestant fashion.
can ya blame them?
I mean Catholics ARE beholden to the pope and it's a perfectly rational consideration that cannot be ignored.
>>2058747
In practice it absolutely can be ignored. Most of them only nominally belong to the religion and take that shit about pride, humility, and forgiveness about as seriously as they take GI Joe PSAs. Notorious ladykiller Jake Kennedy included.
And it's not like the pope is going to demand something batshit like a new crusade anyway. The Holy See is only getting milder as time goes on.
Did he really take orders from the pope?
>>2059281
No, he gave the pope orders.
>>2059311
>This is what Catholicucks actually believe