If the Bible is not literally true, does this mean God does not exist?

>>2055375
yep

>>2055375

/his/ is full of atheists, agnostics and nihils, they are going to say no.

>>2056204
you mean yes...

>>2055375
For awhile I thought that God made it look so wrong simply as a joke and was trying to trick me into not believing

>>2055375
But Bible could be false but then some God might exist, it doesn't logically necessitate backwards.

But if the Bible is true, then technically it's description of God would be true as well. But obviously that's not the case.

>>2055375
Poorly worded question. Read some more and try again in 10-15 years

>>2056417
i bet you couldn't convincingly say that to someone in the real world. how old are you even, 17? go back to /pol/ keklord.

>>2055375
The capitalization of "God" really feels like a subversive idea.

>>2055375
The bible can't be taken literally, it is subtle with hidden messages. Also God, any God does not depend on the book of hus religion, but the book does. There might be a God that no one has fully understood, not Christians, neither Muslims, Buddhist or Hinduism. The books relflect what did the people understood from what the supposed God 'said.'

God is not literally real

How is the bible Gods word anyways?

>>2055375
No. Due to human imperfection it is possible for the Bible to be flawed because humans wrote it. Even if they had divine intervention there could still be flaws due to human misunderstanding of God's word.

>>2055375
I'm an atheist, and no

>>2055375
your assumption is incorrect