aight, I have to debate in class tomorrow.
I have to take Rawls position on social justice while embodying a government.
my Opponent is gonna be Nozick and opposition.
how do I win?
>>2022680
Laxatives in his coffee
>>2022687
Any more ideas?
You cant win using the rawlsian position.
>being forced to take a position
kek
>>2023339
>I've never competed in college debate
Being able to not choose your side detaches yourself from the situation so you can be more clear headed and as such, make clearer, more precise, and tightly linked arguments.
>>2023398
Technically I haven't since I've gone to university but not college. Here, colleges are technical schools with a focus on engineering, welding, sports, and the like.
But anyway:
>bias is bad for arbitrary reasons lets design a generations of automatons
>>2023332
this tbqh senpai
>>2022680
quote his argument on viewing things from a veil of ignorance and hope the other guy is not smart enough to see that it based on undefended assumptions about morality and utility.
Your best chance is that Nozick'a arguments were also really stupid
>>2023332
thought so. after all Nozick wrote all his shit to contradict Rawls. welp, gotta give it my best shot
>>2023339
absolutely standard in any course. and yes, I go to Uni as well
>>2024149
>absolutely standard
In 'sciences' sure.