Is this a viable political stance?
>>2002329
what the fuck does that even mean? Darwinism isn't even a political stance
>inb4 social darwinism
>Darwinism
>"lets combine it into some psuedo-intellectual ideology"
>"durr, Survival of the fittest must mean something philosophically"
>while completely ignoring the origin on the statement
When will this meme die.
>>2002338
>>2002377
http://darwinianconservatism.blogspot.com/?m=1
The Left has traditionally assumed that human nature is so malleable, so perfectible, that it can be shaped in almost any direction. By contrast, a Darwinian science of human nature supports traditionalist conservatives and classical liberals in their realist view of human imperfectibility, and in their commitment to ordered liberty as rooted in natural desires, cultural traditions, and prudential judgments.
>>2002329
Darwin had nothing to do with social darwinism.
>>2002329
>survival of the fittest combined with everyone be nice to each other
>>2002377
>"durr, Survival of the fittest must mean something philosophically"
>while completely ignoring the origin on the statement
The phrase originated from Herbert Spencer in a philosophical context, you pseud.
>>2002329
What do you mean by viable? Not retarded? Then no.