Which is the anti-intellectual stance? A. People with college

I've always characterized it more as "Those with college degrees think they know what is best for everyone, but it really doesn't look like it from my perspective so I will resist."

>A. People with college degrees are intellectually superior to those without, so more people should get college degrees.

This one. It suffers from the ludic fallacy

File: GoetheAndSchillerMonumentAtWeimar.jpg (1MB, 1154x1422px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1154x1422px

>>1995898
A is the anti-intellectual stance.

Colleges and universities need to be razed and restructured, so as to again become a meeting ground for superior aristocratic minds.

>>1995898

A

A college degree means you're likely to be more intellectually qualified than average.

>>1995946
That's fucking retarded


Mental Illness, incest and backstabbery don't advance society, scientists, writers and businessmen do, not retarded LARPing silverspoons with no work ethic

The first. College educated can mean anything from being a microbiologist to a fememist that refuses to use rational thought.

File: gauss.jpg (12KB, 220x280px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 220x280px

>>1995953
Nice bourgeoisie propaganda you cuck.

Scientific advancements have historically only been found by aristocratic autiste geniuses whom practiced some field of science as a hobby.

Before Internet
>B
After Internet
>A

There's no real practical reason to go do college these days, other than to get a 'u smart' paper that can help you get a job

>>1995964
I know it is in a way true, but kek

>>1995964
Or Merchants.
Or Kings.

The problem with Pre Industrial Research and Applied Technology is that Pre Industrial it takes a lot of time to do technology.

Image writing a book on metallurgy, page by page, when there is no standardized language for it inside of Latin. And each regional dialect has words with different meanings for the subject.
And because sharing isn't top priority, everything you write down might be wrong.
Diagrams might exist, but they are not standardized enough that you can make a shitty one, and everyone can copy.
Limited material salvage and no mass production means very low productivity in general.


Remember: Pre modern is a time when some rich somebody would encounter a problem, and post a Bounty expecting some entry level solution in 10-30 years.
The person providing a solution might not even have, he might be a trader from some exotic region, who will on his natural trade route try to pick up the solution.
"Exotic" in this case would be anywhere thats further away than the next city state over.

>>1995982
Honestly it was useless even before the internet.
Academia is a bizarre remnant from medieval times. The internet is the last nail on the coffin.

t. man who is doing a PhD for the sole purpose of remaining a student a few years more, like 90% of PhD even if they don't admit it

>>1995941
this

>>1995982
and this