Will all history be perfectly documented from now on?

>>1994028
>documented
No. People who document history will never do it "perfectly". But it could be, while not perfectly recorded, much more acurately recorded as even confidential government information is being retrieved by hackers and could be impossible to hide at some point.

I understand why you would think so, but the age of the internet and freedom of publication for more people is so much worse for any sort of organized and objective "truth".

>>1994028
There will be a plethora of conflicting narratives and downright falsehoods. See the media today.
People on the future won't know what to make of it. That is if they even have the ability, if they won't have the correct narrative shoved down their throat. Modern men are too willing to give up freedom for stability.

>>1994028
Until the aliens arrive.

>>1994028

We don't even properly understand events 5 years ago.

There's still debate going on about the Arab Spring.

>>1997478
> Modern people are too willing to give up freedom for stability
Because freedom is fucking frightening. Basically all of society and all its forms are to reduce freedom for stability. Red light in traffic, introducing rituals, application norms, wearing clothes etc.
The reason we behave the way we do is so that we can expect others to act accordingly. It's not about
>The more freedom the better and people with more freedom will be more happy
It's about
>The right amount of freedom and people will be happy
The problem being is, that humans are individuals and have individual needs of freedom and security. So there will always be an imbalance and people striving for more freedom while others strive for more stability

History is not "that which happened". History is "a persons account of that which happened". Important to understand this differentiation, will save you a lot of worry.