What historical hairstyle do you like? I like this late 18th to early 19th century era one, dunno what it's called though. I remember Hegel and Beethoven had this kind of hair too. Napoleon too, before he grew his hair. Female too, by the way.
I think that some of the greco-roman hairstyles were pretty /fa/.
The best hairstyles and popular clothing definitely goes to the 18th-19th centuries in Europe.
>>1989891
>I'm a girl xD
Fuck off.
>>1990070
I think OP meant he wanted to know about historical female hairstyles as well.
>>1989891
>tfw you have curly hair so you cannot have that hairstyle
Are there any good historic curly male hairstyles?
late XIII / early XIV century
Anyone find interesting how the popular hairstyles for men have seen very small variation in the last century, specially compared to those of women?
I mostly see straight, short hair and vast foreheads in men, whereas girls might have it at different lenghts, straight or curly, ponytails etc
>>1990562
I noticed that about fashion as well.
Men just wear dark coloured suits with some variations of collars and ties, while women wear all possible and impossible kinds of clothing. Even in an informal environment you'll see at least 90% of men with jeans and a t-shirt.
>>1990447
Is that not curly hair?
>>1990447
t.kike
>>1991236
What about the Renaissance and Antiquity though? Men even wore dresses/ robes and "legging "
>>1991268
Well more than just legging, all types of hats and hairstyles were common amongst men during Renaissance.
I unironically love some of the Hitler youth haircuts.
I'm not another /pol/ faggot who says cuck, I just think it looks really cool. Neat, yet still unique.
>>1989891
You mean the regency hair?
>>1991369
So does the whole of /fa/ you're not special it's literally a really popular haircut
>>1991416
It was what historical haircut you like. So i posted it. i'm not trying to be special, stop looking for things to be angry about.
>>1991936
Nobody's angry. His point was that you don't have to be apologetic about liking the haircut, it's to this day a very popular haircut.
>>1991369
embrace fash, young goy
>>1989891
The hair style is called "dog ears" or "dog's ears"
It was present in the late 18th c. Napoleon himself had the hair as a young officer.
It became incredibly popular after the turn of the century (Regency / First Empire)
>>1991370
Murat a cute
>>1992192
Isn't it actually just a kind of mullet?
>>1992205
It's not *just* a mullet. It's the ultimate mullet
>>1992192
There was a good deal of variataion within the bounds of the dog's ear style
You can see the Incroyable has wavy "mullet" descending in the back,
While Murat has a curly "mullet"
And Darcy in the OP has no "mullet" at all
The style was often a fairly wild tangle of curls like Nappy, Darcy, Murat, and the Incroyable had. But more orderly variations of the style existed the only real requirement for the style was that the hair was curly and frizzed out especially on the sides.
18th c. dog's ears tend to have larger volume and be more orderly
19th c. dog's ears are generally more like Murat or Darcy
Young Stalin's hair
If we include intricate facial hair as a hairstyle I'll say the muttonstasche
>Polish halfshaven head (Polish: czupryna, podgolony łeb, łaszczówka) - is a traditional polish noble haircut, associated mainly with sarmatism, but worn by Poles in Middle Ages too. It's marked by shaving hairs above the ears and on the neck on the same height, with longer hairs on the top of the head. For hundreds of years it was a typical of Poles.
>>1992355
Is this even a legitimate picture of a young Stalin?
>>1992430
Yes
>>1992380
12th century, striking similarity
>>1992442
He's handsome for sure, but I just keep picturing a high pitched Georgian bumpkin accent coming out of his suckhole.
>>1992430
No. Stalin was described as ugly, with some sort of skin condition on his face.
>>1992733
It's a heavily touched up photo. Here's his mugshot from 1911.
>>1993041
There's the genocidal madman we all know and love.
>>1993262
What genocide?
>>1990070
you dipshit
kek
>>1993307
Sorry not genocidal. Just someone who consented and was complicit in the mass starvation and killing of his own population in order to hyperindustrialize his peasant society.
>>1993041
A lot can happen in 10 years.
oiuiu