Was Attila the Hun white or Asian?
I mean, did he look like a modern day Hungarian or like your average Mongolian?.
Goat fucker Mongoloid
>>1985315
Speaking of Mongoloids. Why did this Euroasian split happen? Why would the east-asian phenotypes still persist after leaving the arctic/Mongolia?
>>1985315
He originated from Central Asia so either Mongol or Turkic
>>1985315
>Short of stature, with a broad chest and a large head; his eyes were small, his beard thin and sprinkled with grey; and he had a flat nose and tanned skin, showing evidence of his origin
>>1985625
Jordanes lived one hundred years after Attila
>>1985315
Neither. They were a mix of various Central Asian nomadics and Iranics.
>>1985631
>There is no surviving first-hand account of Attila's appearance, but there is a possible second-hand source provided by Jordanes, who cites a description given by Priscus.
And Priscus did meet Attila... soooo
Guess where the name "Hun" comes from.
>>1985315
He was central asian, possibly mongoloid.
>>1985315
He was of aryan nordic stock. How else could someone oh his caliber strike such terror and win such victories?
>>1985315
Probably Asian with a little bit of white.
Physically, Attila is described by Jordanes as short and stocky, with a large head, small eyes, a thin beard, a flat nose, and a swarthy complexion
The Huns were a people described in the following manner: “…the terror of their looks inspire in their enemies with no little horror by their awful aspect and by their horribly swarthy appearance. They have a sort of shapeless lump, if I may say so, not a face, and pinholes rather than eyes.”(5) A race of men who were short and bow-legged, riding their fast steppe ponies and living on their steeds terrorized Europe. They practically lived and slept on horseback, they ate half-raw meat, which was kept beneath their saddles, and shot their arrows with frightening accuracy
>>1985315
they grow up without beards, plump necks, and bow-legged
Ammianus Marcellinus (c. 390), Roman History, Book XXXI
>>1985740
t. Varg Vikernes
>>1985740
No no the Huns were a tribe of Finns
>>1985315
Magyars have nothing to do with the huns
>>1987264
this
non magyars call them hungarians because they occupy the carpathian basin which was the hub of hunnic activity centuries before
>>1985368
>hy would the east-asian phenotypes still persist after leaving the arctic/Mongolia?
Maybe you should inform yourself, first of all they do not always persit, some native americans do not look anything like Mongoiloids, second of all Native Americans are not East Asians genetically, they are their own group which came from a group who was ancestors both to East Asians to a degree, and to Caucasoids to a smaller degree.
>>1987299
that would explain the state of Detroit today
>>1985315
Romans said Huns looked really weird and distinct, so probably Mongolian.
>>1985315
>huns
>white
are you dumb?
>>1985315
Attila was finngolian
>>1985315
Attila was a norse aryan and the first viking