Solve the Münchhausen trilemma

>>1980537
What's the trilemma?

>Solve
It's not a problem or a puzzle. Just denial or acceptance.

>>1980537
It renders itself unsolvable, that's the whole point. It is the solution to every problem, ultimately, even itself, but that's circular, which is exactly the point.

>>1980537
Foundationalism because it's the only way to proceed to a sensible inquiry regarding nature. Aristotle was right about (almost) everything.

File: consider the following.png (105KB, 396x265px)

105KB, 396x265px

>>1980537
It's not a problem it's a fact.

Every argument is a Münchhausen trilemma.
Every argument is a logical fallacy.

Human logic is inherently incoherent and/or incomplete.

File: trilemna.jpg (26KB, 400x317px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 400x317px

>>1980548
some meme-tier boat

Falsifiability

>>1980537

Omniscience, if it were possible, would be the only "solution" to the trilemma.

My Interpretation? You can only ever know the whole truth of events you have personally conceived of and brought to pass. Anything else must be taken with a grain of salt unless the event can be perfectly reconstructed which is rare/difficult.

WHAT ARE YOU FAGGOTS TALKING ABOUT