http://uk.reuters.com/article/oukoe-uk-britain-tutankhamun-dna-idUKTRE7704OR20110801
EXCUSE ME A MOMENT
...BUT WHAT YOU ESTEEMED GENTLEMEN AND SCHOLARS APPEAR TO BE SUGGESTING IS....
W
E
>>1979921
But anon, 99% of british men today are brown muslims.
Checkm8 crackers.
Fuck ancient Egypt and everyone who has a raging hard-on for it.
W
So this is fine but when I point out that 60% of Finns share King Ruriks(founder of Russia) DNA I get memed?
>>1979921
Baseless speculation.
He was a Berber.
>>1979921
Tutankhamun was spanish
Okay? All you need is one Egyptian dude to come over during the Roman Empire and have children.
>>1979934
I would really appreciate source.
>>1979921
Interestingly, a cockroach shares 70 percent of human dna.
>>1980024
>two worthless species share DNA
wow surprising
>>1980006
No
>>1980042
Then get cancer you americunt piece of shit I'm glad niggers are killing you.
>>1979931
>>1980024
>>1980035
>My nation? America. My heritage? Doychland. Le death to britannia!!
Pathetic lads.
>>1980057
Well, I'm not American, so I don't care.
PHARAOS
>>1980080
Uh, no. 100% are. 70% are related in this very specific way.
>>1979921
You are so unbelievably retarded and so are those retarded sensationalist journalists
>>1980057
I just found the source but I'm not gonna tell you because you're a cunt. lol
>>1979921
>70 percent of british men share king tuts DNA
that pic makes it painfully obvious
>>1979921
Literally Celts. Indo-European chariot culture went far and wide.
>>1980242
AYE LADDIE, WE WUZ RIGHS AND SHEEIT
>>1979921
100% of human beings have African heritage.
Really makes you think.
>>1980363
It was probably an edit made in one of those browning threads.
>>1979921
>http://uk.reuters.com/article/oukoe-uk-britain-tutankhamun-dna-idUKTRE7704OR20110801
"Geneology center."
Literally just a paper written to drum up hype for their pseudo-scientific business model.
King tut has no descendants. Nobody is a descendant of King tut.
We share 60% of our DNA with Bananas.
100% of British men share a banana's DNA.
>>1980674
>We share 60% of our DNA with Bananas.
How is that quantified? The human genome is five times larger than the banana genome.
>>1979921
Isn't the particular r1b clade more common in middle-eastern men? Also Ramesses III belonged to the haplogroup e1b1a.
Sensationalist head line.
>>1979921
This obviously means that the ancient Egyptians were of Anglo descent
We were royalty and such oi m8 I'm telling you I swear on me mum
our blood la
that's rather meaningless.
100% of americans share DNA with fruit flies.
>>1980006
go to Hbrowse, go to the queen category, and it is the 8th one. sorry, I can post the link without being marked as spam
Your welcome bro, lucky I have some experience
This article is very misleading
King Tut had ydna R1b like many Europeans but it's simply a paternal marker and there are African subclades as well
c l i c k b a i t
>>1980006
915122/7eaeead9cb/
if you don't spoonfeed the retards they will starve
>all these butthurt libtards getting mad nordicism is being proven more and more right by the decade
>>1979921
bow down to our British overlords
>>1981007
I don't understand what you have against spoonfeeding. Knowledge is not more valuable just because you actively searched for it.
>>1979921
Tutankhamen had only two stillborn daughters. Are you implying....
>>1980754
>muh human superiority
Humans ~20,000 genes
Bananas ~35,000 genes
Most large plants have more genes than animals
Most insects have more genes than mammals
>>1979921
thicc
WE
>>1981724
This.
>>1981724
The Eternal Banana at it again.
>>1979921
T H I C C
http://humansarefree.com/2014/09/king-tut-was-eastern-european-according.html?m=0
Island slavs confirmed
>Tutankhamunovic was a Serbiam warlord who drove the Croat and stink turk out of our lands
>>1983020
>Tutankhamunovic
jej
Osiris is a Serb
And he will guarantee us a good harvest
>>1981783
>>1981828
>>1979921
AYO HOL UP
>>1979921
>Among modern-day Egyptians this haplogroup contingent is below 1 percent, according to iGENEA.
Looks like modern day Egyptians weren't even kangz and sheit.
>>1983343
SO U BE SAYIN
>>1979934
>and everyone who has a raging hard-on for it.
Ancient Egypt is one of the few historical cliches that I'm actually fully in favor of. You have to remember that Ancient Egyptian civilization developed ~3500 BC or ~5500 years before our present time. That's just insane, when Egyptians were building cities and even pyramids the rest of the world was literally just emerging from the caves, as Egyptians were developing either the first or the second ever human civilization.
>>1980128
I want to see what happens next keep going pls