Is a mind/body duality necessary? Even sensible?

I don't know.

>>1976229
this should be on /sci/ and the answer is no

>>1976229
Thats not the duality

fucking retard

the gap is supposed to be between mind and matter not shoulder and brain

>>1978768
WRONG

Subjective / objective.

Your theory of "the world" is itself, to you, only an experience in your mind. It's vivid enough that you extrapolate that "you" are also in the world.

Panpsychism is really the only logical conclusion. The only alternative is that a wizard inserts consciousness suddenly and magically into certain physical structures.

>>1981145
less wrong but still wrong

>>1976256
the philosophy of mind is not neuroscience

>>1981212
Proofs?

File: 1479575689234.jpg (124KB, 831x639px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 831x639px

>>1981168
Then how about you tell him why he's wrong numbnuts

>>1981221
subject matter

>>1981224
thats not proofs

>>1981231
Yes it is. They study different things, hence they are not the same. Neuroscience deals with the structure of the brain and nervous system and philosophy of mind studies the nature of the mind and related questions

>>1981239
So math has nothing to do with physics got it

>>1981244
embarrassing post

>>1981251
nice non argument

File: plato_360x450.jpg (245KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 800x1000px

>>1981145
This

>>1981258
You don't have an argument and you're moving goalposts. Yeah, there's some relation between neuroscience and phil. of mind just like there's a relationship between mathematics and physics, but they're not the same. It's called neurophilosophy

>>1981263
Philosophy is the mother of all sciences because it studies human though all there is and all that shit if it can't be conceived by it you won't find it in any of its otehr branches just as if a mathematical formula can't be conceived theres no way of explaining a natural occurrence

All philosophy born from logic will always be a hard science