On a scale of 1-10 How based was he?

Based? The man's claims were entirely baseless! I'll give him a 0! As in, you're a Zero!

My dear OP, I hesitate to rate Jung like that. I can honestly say that he is one of the most fascinating people I have read, along with Nietzsche. I first got introduced to Jung through Joseph Campbell when I first got heavy into mythology in my 20s. Jung seemed to open a door for me, and while a few of his ideas were in error or have since been improved upon, he has been a large influence in my life and I still consult Jungian analysis to this day, especially in regards to interpreting the psychological meaning of dreams.

>>1973834
You don't matter

>>1973834
This. New Age esoteric horseshit masquerading as science

He did for psychology what The Lord of the Rings did for psychology.

File: 72599297.jpg (161KB, 500x478px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 500x478px

>>1973834
>>1974111
>>1974115

>>1973813
looney/10

Why all the hate for Jung?

Solid 0/10 human being.

>>1976569

We value reality around here.

Better than Freud and Lacan that's for sure so I'd say like 8/10.

>>1976569
People tend to not like seeing psychology mixed with mysticism

File: carl-jung-irritates-759x500.jpg (80KB, 759x500px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 759x500px

11, one of the smartest men of all time.

Whenever he's brought up on /his/ posters will attack him without even understanding his ideas.

>>1976633
This. People can´t handle their shadows and go projecting their disgusting animas on everyone

>>1976632

Is the implication here there is more concrete validation for psychology compared to mysticism?

>>1976632
>People tend to not like seeing psychology mixed with mysticism

But it's not psychology mixed with mysticism and you would know that if you actually read his books instead of listening to your Marxcuck professors.

I like him. I want to believe

10