There is no objective basis for the burden of proof. Prove me wrong.

FLEXED

File: more honorable turk.jpg (19KB, 229x220px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 229x220px

>Prove me wrong.
make me.

>>1963994
Burden of proof is on you, OP

File: SpookBuster.jpg (42KB, 542x535px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 542x535px

>>1963994
>objective basis

Spooky

>>1963994
Do you consider the history of those people who chose to abide by it and the practical applications of their ideas, compared to those who didn't bother, objective or at least useful?
>Although I see what you did there and it's kinda fun.

>>1964033
>stirnerdrone so spooked by his eagerness to fit in with his leftypol """friends""" that he misses the word 'no'

>>1964045
>>1964033
What is with all the love for that narcissistic fuck anyway?

There's no objective basis for anything.

>>1964052
How about the belief that your own consciousness exists or the inputs of pain that you cannot ignore when they are happening?

>>1964058
How can one know for certain that they exist?

I think therefore I am doesn't work when you realise that potentially somebody else is doing all the thinking who you're unaware of