What are the best arguments for and against the existence of

>>1953638
Truth is the fact.The essence.The `is´of the thing.

File: russell.jpg (38KB, 351x450px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 351x450px

>>1953638
Start with the logicians

>>1953644
But that denies the plausibility of various truths, but rather one only, since there can be only one 'is' since anything other than the 'is' wouldn't be, as Parmenides puts it, not sure if I explained myself correctly

File: 858973._SX540_SY540_.jpg (26KB, 289x274px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 289x274px

science is the only process for determining truth with a high degree of reliability.

>>1953664
>But that denies the plausibility of various truths, but rather one only, since there can be only one 'is' since anything other than the 'is' wouldn't be, as Parmenides puts it, not sure if I explained myself correctly

>Truth is the fact.The essence.

You get it,buddy?

>>1953690
Then truth is perfect and then unachievable, so why bother with discussions? Also god then exists as Nietzsche explained it in his books