Theory: Vikings went to plunder England all the time, but not

File: bd8503c989c8b661c1f735cb160b5b49.jpg (25KB, 236x422px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 236x422px

Sweden has such beautiful and healthy women because it practiced soft eugenics from the 1920s to 1979.

anglo women are fookin' nasty m8

>>1944240
You call that beautiful?

>>1944342
t. turk rape baby

>>1944240
I tough it is due the hormonal stimulation caused by immigrant cocks.

>>1944410
go back to /pol/

It's really more of a class thing, because middle class and upper class brits are prettier. The British working class eats badly, lacks culture and lacks pride. This is probably due to the way industrialisation happened in Britain, and the fact that we have had no popular revolutions. If you look at Australia, which is mostly descended from British working class, they're better looking. Same with New Englanders. Fuck, while we're at it, same with East Yorkshire, Oxfordshire or other more prideful, rural areas. I'm quite convinced it's environmental.

Also if your theory were true then the ugliest girls would be in the areas with the most Viking raids/under the Danelaw which isn't the case. If anything its more the other way around.

>>1944231
Believable yes, but once the dawn comes and you go sober you realize the theory is just silly.

>>1944439

Don't forget that the English working class actively fights against its members moving up the social scale. The documentary "Skint" covering the absolute dregs of the British welfare system had a guy who summed it up. "People round here will steal the shit out if your arsehole. Not because they want it, but because they don't want YOU to have it".

>>1944240
>manface

>>1944231
That's one of the dumbest things I've ever read, and I've read some real dumb shit

If you want to see an Anglo-Scandinavian race, look at Iceland

>>1944240
The more time i spend on the internet, the more i hate Sweden.
Left wing or right, they're just complete autists.

File: jbf.jpg (247KB, 1200x1803px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 1200x1803px

Celtic-looking Brit

File: 7632.jpg (270KB, 960x1440px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 960x1440px

Germanic-looking Brit

>>1944231
You are a retarded fuck and deserve to fuck off.

File: 1478725350547.png (531KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

531KB, 900x900px

>>1944240
>beautiful and healthy women
I hope you're not referring to your pic.

>>1945286
t. homo

>>1945286
We know you like your women obese and hairy buddo

>>1944742
not an argument

>>1944240
>50 years of immoral socialism made your manfaced women blonde

Nah. That was the Ice Age.

And Scandinavia has been collapsing ever since the Ice Age because that "genetic capital" is careening directly towards African-level because of your retarded culture (which has always been retarded) and lack of being naturally selected for making sustainable civilization.

>>1944231
Nah, brits are just inbred as fuck.

Saxon father + Briton mother = ugly children

>>1944231
Brits were actually ugly, and the half vikings actually improved the genetics of the lower class.
Notice how the descendants of the companions of William the Conqueror are also much more attractive than the average brit

Theory:

Lower class british live and eat like shit in their completely americanized society with less health and dentalcare than scandinavian women

File: Europe_sunshine_hours_map.png (97KB, 1360x1245px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1360x1245px

>>1944439
This
Also climate

>>1944439
Brits are inverse Russians, handsome men and ugly women. I guess not caring makes women uglier than men.

>>1946103
You jest, but there's some truth in a way
Sometimes you get couples where one person looks incredibly Celtic (rounder face, dark hair, etc) and another who's much more Germanic (slimmer face and frame, more defined features, etc). Sometimes this creates aesthetically pleasing combinations, especially in women, where they get 'softer' but also fairer features. However, you also get the reverse: people who inherit a combination of the darker hair/facial hair/eyes of a Celt but also the pointed nose, thinner lips, etc of a Germanic. Hence people that look like the Eternal Anglo himself, Oswald Moseley.

>>1946151
I think there's some truth in this too. Thinking about my days at school, there was maybe one girl out of 150 in my year that was genuinely beautiful. A lot of the lads were pretty aesthetic, started going to the gym in their early-teens, played some kind of sport (football, rugby, cricket, golf) at weekends, etc.
We're about a decade on now from when I finished and the girls have continued to get uglier and been run-through by half-a-dozen to twenty cocks apiece. Not only have they gained weight, they've adopted more extreme feminist attitudes to counteract this as it's easier to retweet Laurie Penny than it is to exercise.
The males have got taller and trimmer, continue to see sport as an important part of their life and thus become aesthetic af. Getting a British woman is like shooting a fish in a barrel, but sadly the barrel's leaked and the fish is dead.
Then you go to an area with a large Polish population and see ugly-as-fuck men with stunning women, nearly always dressed in either a classy dress or their running gear on the way back from a workout

>>1944231
wouldn't that only affect Denmark?

>>1944439
It's this. If you go to posher parts of London or places like Exeter, Bristol or York. The average 20 year old girl is hot as fuck, and much better looking than the average American or even continental. Then you go twenty miles away and the girls immediately become distinctively fugly.

The rich have children with good looking people, it turns out.

>>1945855
>lack of being naturally selected
there is no such thing in an existing member of any species of life.

Memeable, close enough.