The Great Debate

>>1941366
They don't have genders. There's no debate about this.

>>1941366
Genders are a social construct

>>1941378
Angels are a social construct.

Wouldn't make any sense to have just one. Obviously there are some of both.

>>1941366
The only ones ever shown in the Bible are male. There may be female angels, but unlike humans, angels (excluding demons) are obedient to God, so all females angels are probably in the kitchen where they belong.

File: Gabriel.jpg (732KB, 2880x1220px) Image search: [Google]

732KB, 2880x1220px

Neither

They're genderless celestial beings.

Likewise god isn't male or female either. Except according to Christians.

>>1941366
Neither, I'm a bad Christian and even I know this

>>1941366

female angels can get tis dick tho

>>1941366
Neither.
The gnostics were right about souls as well, there's nothing to indicate the soul has a gender, therefore the gender roles mainstream churches spewed out were nonsense.

>>1941366
Are they even supposed to reproduce?

>>1941731
No, they're immaterial substances and therefore have no apparatus with which to reproduce.

>>1941760
> implying Mary didn't get some divine dick

>>1941731
Well they reproduced with the Gentilles

>>1941366
Male because all the majors one where

File: Michael.jpg (4MB, 2825x4259px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2825x4259px

>>1941366
What difference does it make?

File: רוּחַ.jpg (69KB, 433x800px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 433x800px

>>1942143
He just blew in her, honestly.

>>1941760
If angels can't reproduce, who were the non-human parents of the nephilim?