What did he mean by this?
What is the negatives of the Federal bank?
he meant he literally killed his opposition who wanted to open the door to oligarchs, in a duel.
>>1915426
>tfw the oligarchs won in the long run
We need another andrew jackson. I was not a fan of the trail of tears, but everything else was great.
>>1915410
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iFDe5kUUyT0
>>1915410
>le banking conspiracy meme
fuck off
>>1917642
yes goy... everything is as it appears hehehe.... you can trust the fed and your government... they work with your best interests at heart hehehe...
>>1917642
are you retarded? it's not even a mystery that the united states is an oligarchy.
>>1917718
This sounds way more like something a leftist would say, sorry
Somewhere along the lines someone decided the economy was an engineer and that an engineer should be entrusted with its proper operation.
Except that for all the good monetary policy has done, the risk of ruin is high thanks to our relative blindness to the complexity in the system (look at the way quants, stats, OR, complexity folks approach things vs what informs monetary policy).
I would like to see a nice line up of non central bank economies vs central bank economies. It's clear that many nations find it useful so I don't want to dismiss it off-hand, but you have to wonder if the technocratic approach is really the way to go, given that economists perform much better at the micro scale than the macro scale.
>>1918233
Pretty much this. It's a little bit ridiculous to trust the management of something as actually complex as an economy to a minister (one guy) and a department (more than one guy but less that all of the people (about 7 billion right now) involved in the world economy)