Does /his/ like David M. Glantz?

Glantz is one of the leading western historians on the eastern front. His stuff is solid.

Yeah, I've been reading his book about the battle of Smolensk.

>>1904759

His methodology is great.

Personally, I can't stand the way he writes myself, I find myself bored. It's amazingly informative, don't get me wrong, but I really have to force myself to read his stuff as opposed to it flowing naturally.

He's the man. Top notch.

You can't bantz the Glantz.

There's no stantzing the Glantz.

Glantz pantz is best flantz.

I dunno I got nuttin.

Smart guy, but why did the publisher use a WWI picture?

Highly informative and is almost as fun as chewing on bark.

>>1905125
Any good? Wanna start getting into some of his stuff but I don't know where to start.

>>1904759
I would like to read some of his books, but they are expensive as fuck.

>>1907242
Yes very good. Begin with the book in OP's pic. Then "When Titans Clashed"