>considering yourself as a well informed and highly educated

>>1886325
Anarco Mutualista here bro

NO GODS NO MASTERS NO PARENTS NO BEDTIMES ANARCHY LIVES!

what is an anarcho-syndicalist?

>>1886325
>smug liberal intellectual: the Platonic form

File: IMG_0515.png (153KB, 752x1668px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 752x1668px

ITT: circlejerking around meme-tier economics

>Chomsky
>Well informed and highly educated
Wew lad

>>1886325
well, because i am a well informed and highly educated intellectual i understand that the only way to live would be in an anarcho primitivism society.. but because i am so smart i understand that there will be immediately a new form of government, because a government is much more efficient than loosely connected tribes... therefore i acknowledge that we all are fucked and nihilism is the answer because in the end it doesnt even matter!

>>1888227
He's highly educated and an excellent linguist. He just has the bad habit of being a moralfag.

>>1888203
So according to this picture, if a society has laws that makes that society authoritarian? Then I guess "true right-wing libertarianism" is chaotic as fuck

File: 1475762994293.png (545KB, 2340x1284px) Image search: [Google]

545KB, 2340x1284px

>>1888203

I've never understood this.

The only way anarcho-syndicalists/communists/etc have ever explained it to me is by appealing to a moral system which they're unable to justify.

Anarcho-libertarians have a similar problem, in that their ideas rely on argumentation ethics. But at least they don't add the extra layer of the threat of coercion on top of that. So it seems to be the more coherent ideology of the two.

>>1888281
>Excellent linguist
Except for the fact he held back scientific progress in the field for 50 years and it still hasn't fully recovered from the cancer that is universal grammar.

>>1888299
Yes, libertarians on any part of the political spectrum are literally on the spectrum. It just evolves into feudalism and the winner holding the largest monopoly of force declares itself a state. Best case scenario it becomes a monarchy or democracy and worst case scenario a socialist shithole

I stopped taking Chomsky seriously around the time he argued people would work shitty jobs for free because he talked about how pleasurable it was for him to plant peach trees. And I say this as a person that's attracted to socialism.

>>1888366
>because he talked about how pleasurable it was for him to plant peach trees
I thought the bones in his fingers would have turned to dust from age by now

>>1888314
libertarian put the coercion of private property of the MOP m8

>>1888366
The funniest thing to see is when he makes his appearances on TYT videos. The fat socialist turk basically worships him like a god and treats him like a genius meanwhile the man is so old and withdrawn that he can barely form sentences at this point.

File: lowering_clouds.jpg (205KB, 1024x559px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 1024x559px

>>1888374

Then they're equally coherent to people who don't already accept either system of ethics.

>>1888381
>The fat socialist turk
M8 he thinks that wanting free healthcare makes you a socialist. I'm not sure if he actually is a "socialist"

>>1888401
>>1888381
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRM9PdDf3zA

>>1886787

NO GODS NO KINGS NO MASTERS!

NO SUNDAY SCHOOL NO HOMEWORK NO GYM CLASS!!!

I'M AN ANARCHIST!!!

Just imagine how peaceful and free a society would be without ANY laws! Even the ones people like! PARADISE!

File: happy.png (2MB, 1368x770px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1368x770px

>>1886325

The only people I ever see worship Noam "THE KHMER ROUGE DINDU NUFFIN" Chomsky are typical normies who are upper class hippies who spend their vast economic freedom engaging in luxury while spouting out some rhetoric drivel like this shit

File: hqdefault.jpg (32KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 480x360px

>not being an anarcho capitalist not because you think it will work, but because of the hilarity that would ensue

>>1888433
>hilarity

I don't think feudalism was hilarious.

>>1886787
>>1888422
Anarchist really do give people who support freedom a bad name.

Natural hierarchy would exist and so would laws. It would probably look similar to feudalism.

If anything, religion would play more of a role in society. The modern state has sought to replace all the functions of church, family and community. The world would be more segregated on race, religion and culture.

But ya, Op Is a retard and so is Chomsky. Egalitarianism is a mental illness.

>considering yourself as a well informed and highly educated intellectual
>aligning yourself totally to one pre-existing position and making passive-aggressive internet posts about it

Its cute how anarchist think their gay utopia would be anything other than anarcho capitalist. Im a millionare, so Im just going to pay a bunch of dudes to be my personal army and then force all you faggots to do what I want and what are you going to do about it? Spout some rhetoric at the guy?

>>1888466
>pay a bunch of dudes to be my personal army
But in an anarchist world money would be meaningless, so how would you pay them?

>falling for the "supporting one socioeconomic system because you think it's the 'best'" meme

The truly wise realize that humans cannot live indefinitely under a single system, and use this fact to their own advantage.

>>1888570
gold? sheep? hookers?

>>1888570

> He thinks only government can create currency that is widely accepted as the medium of exchange and store of value.

Kek, Marxist are cute.

>>1888570

You pay them with superior food, shelter, weapons, and entertainment.

Money is just a placeholder.

>>1888599
Where do you get these things?

>>1888604
Through being clever, and getting other people to do it for you, for a small management fee.

>>1888596
this. look up corporate towns in 19th century america. they gave their employees company scrip instead of dollars which they could use at the company-owned stores

>>1888624
>getting other people to do it for you
Why would they do it if you are exploiting them of their labour?

>>1888599
If they have the guns why don't they just take all of your shit?

>>1888638
maybe you should read Tom Sawyer

>>1888636
>being tied to a single corporate owned town and being paid in monopoly funny money that you can only spend at the stores they own is a good or desirable outcome
ancaps not even once

File: doge on house.jpg (115KB, 428x426px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 428x426px

>starting a /pol/ thread on /his/
>"syndicalist"

>pretending that government is a vague but menacing force and somehow not people
>not accepting that any kind of organized group of people that creates some kind of standard rule set for a group to follow is literally a government.
>not trying to more evenly distribute political power to as many people as possible using systems already in place
>not trying to emphasize a society based on humane scientific advancement & cultural richness, rather x favorite economic ideal

>>1888364
>monarchy is a best case scenario
>democracy and "socialist" are mutually exclusive

>Being anarcho anything

>>1888645
But he's a mean, mean guy

File: image.jpg (54KB, 487x432px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 487x432px

>>1888433
>>1888441

>not watching autistic ancaps recreationally nuke each other with your Democratic confederalist/ anarcho syndicalist buddies from afar

>>1886325
I'm some sorta facist libertarian socialist or some fucking shit

>>1888203

>there is no such thing as left libertarianism

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-libertarianism


Objectively false, considering there were left wingers who opposed the authoritarian left (George Orwell)

File: image.png (1MB, 1334x750px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1334x750px

>>1890296

Please explain...

>>1890308
I don't really know to be honest, I think aspects of all political viewpoints are valid, and my opinion changes rapidly
But it comes down to me thinking humans are dumb fucks that need guidance, but at the same time hate the idea that people can dictate what you can and cant do, of course assuming it does nothing to hurt others
Basically I hate the idea of authoritarian figures, but I think they're also the best way to advance

>>1888203
>circlejerking
>only 4 comments, 2 of them making fun of the OP and 1 of them asking a question

wew

>>1888299
no, maybe political ideologies operate on a multifaceted spectrum rather than four big blocks with colors?

>>1888341
>>1888281
he's been debunked and he's a fucking retard in every aspect of study

Anonymous ## Mod 2016-10-29 00:05:03 Post No.1890473
[Report]

Anonymous ## Mod 2016-10-29 00:05:03 Post No.1890473 [Report]

This thread was moved to >>>/pol/94990482