Do you guys see syncretism in the future of Christianity and

Who Zensunni here?

>>1882625
absolute heresy

no, they are toxic to each other

Islam is way too fundamentalist and opposed to inter-religious dialogue to believe any syncretism, even accidental, could happen.

Furthermore, Christianity is too attached to dogma and universalism to do the same.

>>1882635
pls. Orange Catholic or gtfo.

>>1882635
>>1882687
goes for those Zenshiite shit heads too.

>>1882625
>next thousand years

Chrislam is already a thing

>>1882625
Jesus christ, how the hell would this happen when we already have hundreds of splinter groups within christianity and to a lesser extent islam?

>>1882625
What would a Christian-Islam hybrid even look like?

>>1882687
>implying orange catholicism isnt just a rip off of buddislamic thought

>they still think the old desert barbarian religions will survive the 21st century

>>1882703
take that back or I'll assassin war your house irl

File: saintyoungmen.jpg (77KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 1024x576px

What was that one New Age religion that talks about and follows the teaching of all of the prophets from around the world?

>>1882625
No. They have different core operating systems. Islam merely claims to be an Abrahamic religion, and backs their claim by cutting your throat if you disagree.

>>1882625
I dunno, maybe?

>>1882707
fuk ur kanly m8 ill fukkin burn ur stones

>>1882625
Maybe. Both were the result of different Imperial cultures adopting Jewish theology. It's even thought that Islam began as a syncretic movement to unite Arab Judaism, Christianity, and what can only be described as Abrahamism until debates with Iraqi Rabbis and absorption of Sassanid Zoroastrian antagonism with Byzantine Christianity set it on a different path.

If the world becomes more and more globalized then an Abrahamic faith further stripped of its Late Antiquity Roman/Persian foundations might be appealing, but at the same time both religions have existed for so long that they're now cultural forces of their own more able to resist globalism than simple regional culture.

>>1882714
sikhism

>>1882910
That's more the gap between Islam and Hinduism.

Islam has extremely strong internal safeguards against syncretism. So no.

>>1882714
Bahá'í Faith?

It seems more plausible to me that theists will increasingly leave abrahamic religions for deism, or pledge cultural allegiance to one or the other while truly being deist or atheist. It's kinda already happening. I can see some transhumanistic crap that bleats promises of eternal life becoming a new "religion" without people recognizing it, though, and would probably draw in a lot of supposed atheists. LessWrong is just the beginning.

>>1882625
I don't get it. They each claim opposing things about Jesus. So they can't be fused, because they conflict with each other.

>>1882699
Islam already incorporates aspects of Christianity, so not much different.

>>1883147
>religions can't survive if they're contradictory

wew lad

>Jehovallah is 1.5 persons
>1.0 God
>0.5 Jesus

>>1883152
Most religions contain paradoxes, not outright conflicting accounts of historical events.

>>1882714
Caodaism?

>>1882684
>Islam is way too fundamentalist and opposed to inter-religious dialogue to believe any syncretism, even accidental, could happen
>what is the middle east before the USA backed fundamentalist coups

>>1882714
Theosophy? It might be a little old to count as new age though.

>>1882726
Lol oh /pol/

Yes, Christians will finally drop their backward ways and join Islam.

>>1882625
They are the similar and are different at the same time.

All it takes is for a Jew, a Muslim, a Christian, a Brahmin, a Buddhist, to be in the same room, talk about their ideas, beliefs, God, and instead of arguing, what usually happens is they apply two concepts of their religion:

Tolerance

Understanding

When they apply tolerance, they start to understand why the other sees it differently. We are all people, and we all have justification for our beliefs and ideas.

If someone wanted to worship Satan, and didn't hurt anyone in the process, technically, they reserve the right to do so. That is how religion should be.

You can't blame a religion for a few tyrants that claim to be "religious" and then say "religion is illogical"

Why? That would be like saying "Hitler? Yes, all German people are just like him" That is false, not all German people are like Hitler. What is more illogical is blaming a religion, because a religion is not a person, it doesn't act people do. This nonsense that religion is illogical, is illogical itself. How does a religion act when it isn't a person

>>1882625
Retarded