Was Charlemagne actually real? Or was he more like king Arthur.

File: image.jpg (86KB, 400x390px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 400x390px

>>1865957
King Arthur was real you insolent cuck.

>>1865957
They literally have Charlemagne's skeleton.

>>1866007
wrong.

>>1865957
>tfw no contemporary sources confirming Charlemagne's existence

He's just a myth you guise! Just like jeeebus xD

>>1866162
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2551055/Charlemagnes-bones-identified-1-200-year-old-remains-German-cathedral-belong-Europes-father-claim-scientists.html

>>1866179
>>1866007
>implying it can ever be know that those are his bones or not

>>1866191
Considering they match his description and were found in his literally golden sarcophagus they're pretty damn sure

>>1865957
>Spain's Cid is an actual historical figure.
>France's Charlemagne existed, but they made a less historical "Roland" the protagonist of their tale.
>Gemany's Siegfried and Brynhildr are based on Frankish historical figures.
>Even England's King Arthur is most likely inspired on a Roman figure from Britania.

Did Achilles and Ulysses exist?