Are there any famous, verifiable rigged elections in history?

>>1865499

This one

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IuJGHuIkzY

>>1865541

Isn't that the guy who did the abortion clinics video?

>>1865541
Not an argument.

>>1865550
the fake abortion clinic videos

>>1865541
How does catching some retarded low-level operatives of the Clinton campaign saying some dumb shit on camera constitute a takedown of Hillary? What a joke.

File: I TRIED SO HARD.jpg (33KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 960x640px

>Are there any famous, verifiable rigged elections in history?
The DNC

Is what I would have said if not for the fact that Bernie "muh college for everyone" Sanders decided to go off the grid into cozy retirement instead of fight for everything he supposedly stood for.

>>1866626

t. DNC shill

>>1865499
Every single election in the Soviet Union

File: Stimmzettel-Anschluss[1].jpg (47KB, 644x472px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 644x472px

>>1865499
The Anschluss referendum was pretty obviously rigged.

>German troops posted at each polling station
>ballot reads "Do you agree with the reunification of Austria with the German Reich that was enacted on 13 March 1938, and do you vote for the party of our leader Adolf Hitler?"
>looked like this
>results were 99.7% for the Anschluss

No German pressure there, no siree.

>>1866695
t. butthurt Trotskyite

File: 1424121728723.jpg (40KB, 467x433px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 467x433px

>>1866702
>that large yes and small no
Hitler was a cheeky lad

>"The 2000 presidential election was the fourth election in U.S. history and the first in 112 years in which the eventual winner failed to win the popular vote (after the elections of 1824, 1876, and 1888)."
the electoral college was invented to rig elections.

>>1866729
Well technically it was invented to clothe slavery in a thin veneer of democracy

>>1866729
>>1866737
Did you forget the part where the Federal Supreme Court overturned the Florida Supreme Court on partisan lines to prevent a recount?

>>1866757
The recount wouldn't have changed shit, but it was still a corrupt move

>>1865499
Nixon vs JFK

>>1866717
>Yes in the center of the paper
>tiny No off to the side

>>1866771
It was clearly rigging though.

>>1866729
Then why did you quote how rare of an occurrence it is? lol

Does gerrymandering count as rigging? Because if you've seen those districts drawn up in 2012.

>>1866814
Not unless their is both A) a more natural set of districts and B) that more natural set of districts would have different election results.

>>1866825
Have you been living under a rock?

>>1865499
every election in a country with the words democratic or republic in its name

>>1866853
explain?

Elections in Eastern European countries after World War II were extremely rigged to benefit the communists.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_legislative_election,_1947

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungarian_parliamentary_election,_1947

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanian_general_election,_1946

>>1866859
Have you seen the American district maps? They fulfill those criteria easily.

>>1866887
A is clearly fulfilled, yes. B is not. No 'fair' redistricting would change any election results.

>>1866902
It would significantly change local election results

>>1865499
The 1917 Canadian federal election.

The major election issue was whether or not the government should conscript soldiers to help in the war effort. The Conservatives were for it, the Liberals against. The Conservatives had already postponed the election a year due to the emergency of the war effort because they knew the situation would be more dire a year later. Furthermore, they purposely extended the vote to women, but only women who we're serving in the military or related to a man serving in the military overseas. The result was overwhelmingly in favour of the Conservatives and a year later they extended the vote to all other white women, a demographic that had been largely against conscription.

>>1866925
Literally no.

>>1866702
>Germany invades before the referendum just to make sure the Austrians don't vote the wrong way.

>>1866941
*were not we're, my mistake.

>>1866902
Voting by counties likely would.
They divide based on demographic generally, but in many areas there is a definite bias. Some whole towns have been split in half between the upper and lower districts. Often times lumping the lower class areas in with the rural lands, or vise-versa to create one area that's solidly in one camp, and another that's a toss up.

>>1866941
Shady, but not precisely rigged. Grey area

>>1866902
Are you joking? It's been demonstrated by numerous studies the whole point of redrawing the maps was to change results.

>>1866951
It just is a fact that gerrymandering does very little to explain the composition of the House of Resp (speaking from US). The left wishes that it did so they could cry (similar to the right desperately trying to cry about voter fraud) but it turns out its just not true. Voters self segregate geographically so hard that any non-demented redrawing would have similar results. Put a big Civilization style hex map over the US and you get basically the same results - might actually favor republicans more because the only hexes that would go blue would be ones containing major metropolitan areas.

>>1866995
And it's been refuted by numerous studies that it actually had any effect.

>>1866996
gerrymandering has a documented fact. When your electoral district is a C shape that cuts through a city and has no discernible demographic or like self-interests or geographic basing. Also, populations aren't even close to as fluid as you seem to think. There are lots of states that are 50/50 democratic to republican yet have 9/10s of the districts as republican (or vice versa).

>>1865499
Many many dead people voted for Kennedy. There is actually a well-known hatred the mob had for JFK, because there is a belief they won him the election cause he's a fellow Catholic and he turned around and attacked organize crime.

File: halal guarantee.png (82KB, 276x354px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 276x354px

>>1866789
>the Nazis were the most underappreciated comedians of all time

>>1866996
>retard who has no idea how the house works thinks districts should be done by geographical size and not population so 1 sq mi of rural bumfuck farmland is worth the same as 1 sq mi of manhattan
What am I reading?

>>1866902
You are fucking deluded

>>1866645
He was bribed into it so he's a literal sellout.

>>1866645
The Dems were clearly never gonna get him elected as their representative. Going independent meant giving the win to the Reps. You could say he had a fighting chance as an independent (and I'd agree), but if the cost of failure is President Trump you might not want to take that bet.

Blame the shitty system.

1927 Liberian election, about 200,000 people "voted" despite the fact there were about 15,000 registered voters.

>>1866870
desu, NKVD estimated that commies got around 50% votes in Poland, so idk about them being "extremely" rigged.

IPN go home

>>1868248
>the cost of failure is President Trump
are you fucking stupid
Trump vs Hillary vs Bernie vs all the other third parties and independents is not the same as strictly Hillary vs Trump
if Bernie went independent that would change a lot of things for future campaigns

>>1865499
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_Year_VIII

Napoleon

> The vote was said to be 3,011,007 in favor, and 1,562 against, which is completely ludicrous to claim that 99.5 per cent of Frenchmen had voted yes

>>1866731
This look like something straight out of Courage the cowardly dog.

>>1869008
Napoleon was so popular he literally turned the army sent to hunt him down with just a speech so I don't see why this would be ludicrous

>>1869061
It was a bit earlier in his life and while he was already popular, the vote would have passed easily, he wasn't that popular.

Also in a period where voter turnouts were something like 10% in the French Republic, Napoleon rigged it to make it look like 100% of the voting population had turned out and voted for him, that is what is preposterous.

>>1865499
The right rigs election by locking up a fuckton of innocent black men and denying them the right to vote: luckily that will soon change.

>>1868892
Bernie would overlap with Hillary's voter base. It's extremely unlikely for all three of them to run without Trump winning.

>>1865499
I know this is a thinly veiled /pol/ thread, but the 1960 Presidential election in the U.S. was rigged.

t. That guy

>>1865499
Almost every Election Caeser ever participated in. To the point of 20 million Sesterces being used to straight up buy an election.

>>1869093
Innocent of what?


Source: FBI.gov
Expanded Homicide Data Table 3
Murder Offenders by Age, Sex, and Race, 2011
White 4,729
Black 5,486
Other 256
Unknown 4077

Table 43a
Arrest by Race, 2011
Robbery
White 35,443
Black 45,827
American Indian or Alaskan Native 619
Asian or Pacific Islander 547

File: 1476395326050.gif (1MB, 286x225px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 286x225px

>>1865567
They weren't fake live in denial. What they said was taken out of context in some cases though.

>>1865556
This is an example of an instance where political powers are trying to manipulate and change the outcome in an ""unnatural"" way (unorthodox methods). You can't prove that statement wrong.

>>1866626
>low level operatives
>what a joke

These people are HIGH level leaders of their organizations that are directly associated with her campaign (proven through the leaks). These are the people she associates herself with, it just shows how rotten the whole Clinton tree is. It's a huge deal.

>>1866729
This is true.

File: image.png (208KB, 500x955px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 500x955px

>>1865556
>Not an argument
yea your right. now direct those amazing powers of observation, detective, at OP, who requested EXAMPLES of rigged elections. nobody was requesting ARGUMENTS about why or why not specific elections were rigged. your ability to absorb information is as broken as your perception of politics

File: image.jpg (105KB, 480x726px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 480x726px

>>1866626
the video is catching the DNC rigging the election

RIGGING THE ELECTION

the election is being rigged. creamer and wasserman would still have jobs if they werent rigging the election. but they do not have their jobs anymore because they were rigging the election

now go vote for the person that righed the election.

>>1865499
Every Soviet election ever.

>>1865499
Liberia 1927.

D. B. King had more votes for him than the entire population of the fucking country.

The argument that the election is rigged came up because in 2008 and 2012 there were entire districts where Romney and McCain got no votes.

However if you look at the districts where Romney and McCain got no votes,these are districts where mostly black people live.

Considering how beloved Obama is in the black community is it really that hard to believe that all the black people in those districts voted for him?

>>1866626
>Low level
>LOW
>LEVEL
You could at least inform yourself before spouting this shit.

>>1871255
>Out of context
There is no possible context where the things they said are not bad.

>>1871332
They are though. They're basically middle-managers or outside consultants. The fact that it is extremely easy for the Clinton campaign to distance themselves from their activities proves that O'Keefe doesn't have any smoking guns that would actually change people's minds about Clinton. Whether you like her or not the fact is that Clinton covers her tracks well-enough that she'll never be directly pinned down for anything.

>>1866805
>There's a 5% chance the soccer team with less goals wins anyway, but it only happens 5% of the time, so it's okay
"no"

>>1866626
>>1871418
One of those guys visited the white house on a weekly basis and had meetings with Obama ~7 times a year for 6 years, he isn't a nobody. Fuck off.

>>1865499
Elections become rigged once you allow every mouth breather to vote. It turns into massive amounts of poor people eating the rich until everyone is poorer then before. We (US) should have kept it to 35 yr old white landowners.

>>1871478
If only landowners could vote everyone else who was not white or owned land would get screwed over and eventually there would be a revolution.

>>1865499

The commie-era elections in Poland. They even didn't bother to open the ballots, just dumped them into junkyards or rivers.

>>1871205
If the crime statistics are invalid and a lot of the black supposed criminals are innocent, then you can't really use those stats as evidence.

>>1865499
Russia, 1997

George Soros did whatever he could to stop left-wing parties from taking power

File: u81449-155629_volitve11xi45_show.jpg (74KB, 400x303px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 400x303px

>>1866702
>>1866789
The communists also knew how to be cheeky
>Thos who vote independent (as opposed to the communist list) are ennemies of our people

File: 6992838.jpg (54KB, 288x368px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 288x368px

US election of 1824

>>1871746
Lel, any good source?

Reminds me of that time our commie authorities designated a natural pit they used as a mass grave for political opponents as dumping grounds for a sausage factory to dissuade anyone from ever trying to dig up the remains.

>>1871986
t. Andrew Jackson

>>1866803
Rigging and being dickish are too different things