Is it possible for great men to arise without the support of

Seeing as how we can almost always point to the accomplishments of subordinates to account for the existence of the accomplishments of the higher man, probably not.

Probably not. That's why most great men have emerged at specific moments and places in history

Who was Napoleon's greatest supporter and what happened to him?

>>1861743
>Napoleon
>great man

Kek

File: williamlee[1].jpg (245KB, 744x511px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 744x511px

>>1861022

>Is it possible for great men to arise without the support of hypercompetent subordinates?

No.

>>1861743
Nappoopan was a manlet.

>>1861999
frogs on suicide watch

File: 1470669077011.png (123KB, 560x365px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 560x365px

>>1861977
Who is this?

>>1861999
Isn't this a meme just because the frogs used a different height measuring system and napoopan was actually average?

Also
Any """""great""""" men totally carried by their subordinates, yet they never ever got an ounce of recognition?

>>1862110

>and napoopan was actually average?

Napoleon was average for his day, but that's still pretty short compared to modern standards.

File: Literally Who.jpg (617KB, 2400x3000px) Image search: [Google]

617KB, 2400x3000px

>>1862110

>Any """""great""""" men totally carried by their subordinates, yet they never ever got an ounce of recognition?

Most people recognize the various President's by name but very few recognize his cabinet, which is a very important part of what makes or breaks a presidency. For example, do you know who this guy is? He's been a very important person for the past 8 years and you have no idea who he is.

>>1862152
You are in fact correct. Can you please enlighten me about him?

File: 1473357689599.jpg (22KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 400x300px

>>1862152
Then again, can a president like Obama even be compared with the great men of old.His results and achievements don't even come close to theirs.

>>1862132
Average height for the time is ok. You can't compare people back then with those today. Also probably 95% of great men of the past were manlets going by that definition. Friedrich, Alexander, etc.

Mein kaiser reindhardto

>>1861022
Yes.
If not we have to assume that every great man was just the pinnacle of a pyramid of ever increasing numbers of correspondingly decreasingly great men.

File: Were underage.png (679KB, 909x657px) Image search: [Google]

679KB, 909x657px

When will a Reinhard save us from the (((Terraists)))

>>1862152
>He's been a very important person for the past 8 years and you have no idea who he is.
Carter's only been on the cabinet for the past year and a half though. SecDef has been an incredibly messy position for the past 15 years.
>>1862187
>can a president like Obama even be compared with the great men of old
Barring becoming a dictator, republicanism kind of prevents this more than the individual. Even looking at deified individuals like Washington, their actual term in the seat was average at best.
>>1862626
His first act as Kaiser should have been plopping a Thor's Hammer on the moon and blowing that shithole planet apart.

>>1862626
>not wanting glory and profit por based phezzan
>not pledging loyalty to the landesherr
>not worshipping our planet of origin

Valhalla cucks are truly disgusting