Is this podcast /his/ approved?

Yes, the WWI series was quite insightful. Quality stuff.

I loved the nazi invasion of Soviet. I wasn't ready for the amount of horrors.

>>1860816

Eh, its good if you know nothing about the subject beforehand and the narrative history is nice but beyond that I would recommend more in depth podcasts like Mike Duncan's The History of Rome and its Fan-made sequel, The History of Byzantium. I still think Wrath of the Khans is his best yet just because of how it sets the tone.

>>1860877

Its good as a story, but he skips a lot of stuff, and I mean ALOT as is almost inevitable when dealing with such a massive part of WW2.

>>1860816
His stuff is excellent.
Obviously some parts are glossed over in the interests of pacing and tension, but in terms of getting an entry-level knowledge of a subject, I don't think there is anyone better.
Dan presents subjects in such an interesting and relatable way it's hard to forget the broad strokes.

As >>1860882 said, Mike Duncan is great too.
A bit less "fun", but goes in to a lot more detail, and is somewhat more focused (good and bad - the tangents in HH are usually very enjoyable) given the shorter episodes.