or is he out of date?
>>1852783
Out of date in some small details, but still very much worth reading
>>1852783
How many times are we going to have this thread?
out of date in some parts
but his command of the english language is amazing
He's out of date but still entertaining and one of the best works on the subject.
He's over weight in some aspects but very much worth feeding.
>>1853228
kek
>>1852783
Only worth reading if you're interested in Historiography. Otherwise it's like reading Paracelsus for your Chemistry.
>>1853360
no its not...lets be honest
he is out of date when it comes to few details
>>1855297
Not the guy you're replying to, but I think that's what he means; you don't read Gibbon so much for an actual analysis as to why the Roman Empire fell apart, you read him for information as to how History as a discipline developed.
I'm guessing an abridged version would keep accurate information?