Did people unironically believe in this for hundreds of years?

>>1848962


It was and is adaptive.

>>1848962
I'm not sure, I really can't grasp things like this in classical thought. How the hell is wet and damp so important of a characteristic, or soft and hard?

File: ecfa0f8ebc713130dc59520c8747dc1f.jpg (3MB, 1500x1871px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1500x1871px

They are still believing in this.

>>1848971
They aren't literal wet and damp, like left and right aren't a literal left and right in political compasses.

>>1848973
>intj is always an immense liar
I almost never lie, lying is annoying because you have to remember them to get away with it.

>>1848986
>completely missing the point

Myers-Briggs enthusiasts, everyone!

>>1848973
This. I came into this thread just to say that it makes about as much sense as the Myers-Briggs model.

>>1848973
>tfw you're lincoln
INT mustard rust

>>1848962
There's 2 billion people who think they will become immortal by eating the flesh of a jewish zombie and telepathically accepting him as their master

Don't question the human capacity for accepting insanity