Nietzsche

>>1837180
>hey this stirner guy seems cool
>let's just turn his entire thing into aristorcratic nonsense

>>1837180
Do (You) get him? Prove it.

>>1837204
I know what Dionysian passion is, that Heraclitean madness,
what life affirmation is and what it means to be a Jasager,
how great despising is really a great yearning, how one stays closest to others by striving against them,
how Christianity is nihilist, how Buddhism is nihilist, how all ideologies which seek to become One are nihilist,
how nihilism is overcome by creation,
and how art is the proper task of life.
God is the enemy of life.

>>1837269
Meh.

>>1837269
>I know this and that

You don't know shit, son.

>>1837594
Trust that I do.

Evola got him, and even beyond I would say.

>>1837728
evola reduces his thought to universal principles

the central premise of nietsche's thought is that universal principles don't exist

>>1837812


Its is a belief that has pragmatic value at least.

The real truth is that feeble ape creatures are limited and variable in their abilities to grasp increasingly transcendent concepts, and that any of their *attempts* to *promulgate* a universal principle that applies in all cases are by necessity doomed to in fact be insidious calumnies that can ultimately mean anything or nothing and hence are weilded in a selective tactical manner by adherents to validate what they already valued prior and devalidate what they don't without necessary recourse to the principle in question.

Man is a subsidiary part of gods great creation, which is greater than he is, and hence always greater than his attempts to fully 'encapsulate' it.

The failure to 'encapsulate' being into a 'system' that can be naively 'calculated' without need for any ability or imagination on the part of the user signaled the failure of that zombie called the enlightenment project and gave rise to post-modernism (who, ironically, retained the same enlightenment standards of evidence, which when followed faithfully like described above [a proposition with no contrary exceptions anywhere] would seem to imply that knowledge all together is impossible; which they of course deploy in a selective manner to devalidate things they don't like while sweeping their own conceits under the bed).


'In Hegel's hands, the dialectic arrives at conclusions he had already reached without it.'

>>1838839
>Its is a belief that has pragmatic value at least.
for some people, but not for free spirits

the rest of your post is word salad so i'll ignore it

File: monmemes.png (204KB, 391x496px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 391x496px

>>1838900


I see, you are actually a homosexual.

>>1839080
what's gay about that

there's a distinction between the herd and the free spirits

>nobody gets him but me

No one fully understands Nietzsche, probably not even Nietzsche understood Nietzsche, and anyone that claims otherwise is a fucking lying tosspot.

>>1837728
Evola couldn't grasp that going for a walk during a bombing run is a bad idea because bombs don't give a shit about your masculine virtue or how many secret raids on the occult beyond you've been on, they will cripple our ass regardless. So I doubt he could figure out Nietzsche (which is confirmed by the rambling, inane, and idiotic mess that his philosophy was).

File: 1407955781090.png (306KB, 977x1400px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 977x1400px

>>1839084


Yes, but in addition to this you are also a fag.

File: 1476583442816.png (279KB, 898x790px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 898x790px

>tfw to smart too misunderstand Nietzsche

File: CONJURINGTHESPIRITS.jpg (252KB, 1280x457px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 1280x457px

>>1839099
>and anyone that claims otherwise is a fucking lying tosspot
Or shares some biological similarities with Nietzsche and consequently may grasp him better, assuming they have read him thoroughly. Family members of mine have had brain cancer and suffered dementia and systolic heart failure at relatively young ages; clergymen are in my family background and my great grandfather even translated his own Luther Bible to English; I am German and Polish; I regularly experience disabling headaches and have hypoglycemia which affects my diet; I was raised without a father in the house and surrounded by women; etc.

Of course, no one will ever be his exact replica, or anyone's for that matter. But I think if you are predisposed to the right conditions, you are more apt to grasp him. For example, many people think Nietzsche is paradoxical, self-contradicting, or dualistic — others think he is systematic — but both positions are false in my eyes, only partially grasping the surface level of his Dionysian philosophy.