Discussion on the History, Cultures, Nations, Languages, Religions, and People of the Indian Subcontinent.
Preferably anything before the British Raj
>>1831029
Mauryan seems interesting.
>Jainism
What is this hippy bullshit?
Was the Tripartite Struggle the Indian equivalent of the Three-Kingdoms period in China?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tripartite_Struggle
>>1831213
What is this?
>>1831112
happy merchant bullshit while they suck the blood of hard working regular people
>>1831213
Nope, because the end result was not unified India, but a more divided India and also, the struggle was not for unifying India, but for pride, which comes with being ruler of Kannauj.
What happens here /his/?
Does anyone know of good matireal on India before British?
>podcasts
>books
>docs
The whole place is just a mystery to me besides a bit about the Gupta I read.
>>1831213
Maybe I'm wrong but from that map one would suppose that the Palas were pretty much irrelevant in the struggle and that Rashtrakutas had the best odds since the start.
Also, is it true that Pratiharas were hindu, Palas were budhist and Rashtrakutas were jains?
>>1834209
I found these;
http://www.ahandfulofleaves.org/documents/A%20History%20of%20India_Kulke.pdf
http://www.investigacioneshistoricaseuroasiaticas-ihea.com/files/HISTORYINDIA-BurtonStein.pdf
>>1834245
>Burton STEIN
Good goy
https://youtu.be/VFPLZfSPjeA
>>1834209
https://youtu.be/-OmZr3HG3bM
>>1834245
Nice textbook, thx f a m