Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
Anonymous
Which crusade was the worst, or accomplished the least? 2016-10-14 17:23:26 Post No. 1824927
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Which crusade was the worst, or accomplished the least? 2016-10-14 17:23:26 Post No. 1824927
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: DEUS VULT.jpg (64KB, 960x720px) Image search:
[Google]
64KB, 960x720px
Which crusade was the worst, or accomplished the least?
Anonymous
2016-10-14 17:23:26
Post No. 1824927
[Report]
OC btw
>>
Why is this even a question
fourth crusade
>ruined byzantium,
>didn't even get anywhere close to jerusalem
>>
Bey Murad II Reis bi (ID: !TURKY998uo)
2016-10-14 17:25:07
Post No.1824933
[Report] Image search: [Google]
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: sultan bin baba.jpg (18KB, 480x452px) Image search:
[Google]
18KB, 480x452px
all of them
even muslims were better crusaders and did more damage to islam than you ever managed to
>>
>>1824931
Are you counting the childrens crusade?
>>
>>1824934
He is counting the Children's Crusade
>>
>>1824927
Peasant's crusade, they straight up got slaughtered in first battle.
>>
>>1824963
Yeah but a bunch of children just straight up got sold in to slavery for no reason and literally fought no battles.
>>
>>1824931
Came here to say this.
>>
>>1824931
>didn't even get anywhere close to jerusalem
They actually did. A good number of the franks led by Reynold of Montmirail chose to go for Jerusalem rather than accept Alexios's offer.
>>
Did any of them "accomplish" anything?
>>
File: BILLY MAYSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS.jpg (29KB, 456x422px) Image search:
[Google]
29KB, 456x422px
>>1825054
Long term: No
Short term: a lotta death, pillaging, and rape.
Thread posts: 11
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3