So many people support reals before feels. It seems like a sensible - /his/ - History & Humanities

Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 4

Anonymous
2016-10-09 14:13:26 Post No. 1800819
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 1399037973259.jpg (408KB, 768x1280px) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-10-09 14:13:26 Post No. 1800819 [Report]

So many people support reals before feels. It seems like a sensible position to take. However, in discuscussion beyond observation inanimate processes and interactions it seems to fall short. The second sentience and worse still, sapience comes into consideration that proposition, "reals>feels" can no longer be accurate. at lest in part.

Do not feels create reals? Are feels not a subsection of reals in the realm on intelligent interaction and prediction?

To deny the importance of feels is to eclipse even the deterministic ideal's diminshment of human agency and influence.
In short, as long as human perception plays a role in observation and biological activity powered by sentience (biosphere) affects the inanimate activity (geosphere): Feels=Reals

Bey Murad II Reis bi (ID: !TURKY998uo) 2016-10-09 14:17:20 Post No.1800827
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Bey Murad II Reis bi (ID: !TURKY998uo) 2016-10-09 14:17:20 Post No.1800827 [Report]

File: koffir.jpg (25KB, 250x201px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 250x201px

Since when did phisolophy become a major part of ebonics?

Anonymous 2016-10-09 14:20:39 Post No.1800835
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-09 14:20:39 Post No.1800835 [Report]

>>1800827
More like ebonics was subsumed by philosophy to make it more palatable.

Anonymous 2016-10-09 14:20:42 Post No.1800836
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-10-09 14:20:42 Post No.1800836 [Report]

File: download (1).jpg (6KB, 183x275px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 183x275px

Feels are basically a short cut in your brain. They are the quick and dirty solutions to life's most immediate problems

Pic very related

Anonymous 2016-10-09 14:46:04 Post No.1800889
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-09 14:46:04 Post No.1800889 [Report]

>>1800819
I agree. I really think the worst STEMcucks are just not as conscious as most people

Anonymous 2016-10-09 14:56:30 Post No.1800914
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-10-09 14:56:30 Post No.1800914 [Report]

File: 1414979689710.png (89KB, 259x344px)

89KB, 259x344px

>>1800836
I don't know about that. Emotion and mood encompass more than just schema heuristics.

All ideology is effectively feels too, given there is no logical or reasoned basis by which to establish their basis and goals.
If you want what is best for everyone and your logical reals lead you to egalitarianism that doesn't diminish the biologically ingrained feels that led you to consider community worthy of investment and happiness to be worth of pursuit over efficacy. Pure logic is tantamount to a "spook" (to use another popular phrase) because nothing in the human experience will ever adhere to it without the introduction of warrants based on idiosyncratic perspective (feels).

With the introduction of the Noosphere Feels have risen in import. Not all feels have anything to do with reals and those that do may not contain 100% truths, however all reals must acknowledge and account for feels.