Why did they lose most of their territory BOTH times their shithole governments collapsed?
>>1777532
because theyre vatniks
they can't stop fucking up
>>1777532
It's interesting to imagine what may have happened if they hadn't sold Alaska. A Soviet Alaska would have completely changed the dynamics of the cold war.
>slavs
How is this even a question
>unironically being subhuman
>>1777561
Being human is overrated anyway.
They still have lots to lose.
Also is the Russian Federation the last old-type empire with bunch of actually different peoples in it?
>>1777730
China and India still exist.
>>1777555
Weren't you dismantled by the Entente and kept in a state of a nationwide cuckery by a minute garrison which they've left behind?
>>1777561
That would be colonials, the descendants of the vermin of the Old continent.
Soon.
>>1777785
Too much meme non-countries for collapse. Probably would be around five or six.
>>1777532
Because if you have a country of such a size and ethnic and religious diversity you're bound to lose those peripheral territories when the central government collapses.
Russia still has it's core territories, and it's backup, tho it's paying a high price for keeping it's backup alive, all the cities are far apart and the infrastructure is costly to maintain, let alone upgrade. It's nigh impossible to build a highway from Moscow to Vladivostok.
Peripheral territories were mostly used as buffers to protect the core, except for Ukraine which served a dual role, and Azerbaijan that gained a more important role with the discovery of oil, by 1901 it was producing half the world's oil.
It also always took a lot of work from the central government of Russia to divide and rule the vast territories. Balancing power internally, manipulating and pitting ethnic groups.
>>1777785
>jewish republic
>jewish autonomous oblast is 0.2% jewish