The great debate Was it autism?

Yes. Those are the eyes of someone who enjoys stacking up stuff and writing lists down.

>>1767938
also the only philosopher ever worth reading

>>1767942
I'll bite. What did he write about?

>>1767952
On philosophy being mostly play-on-words that got out of hand

>>1767963
So he thought that the Sophists were right all along?

>>1768249
I was under the impression that playing on words over actual coherence was what sophistry stood for?

>>1767963
>On philosophy being mostly play-on-words that got out of hand
So he just regurgitated what Nietzsche said in a much less poetic style?

>>1769155
>>1768980
>>1768249
>>1767963
>>1767952
>>1767942
>>1767938
>>1767871

Kill yourselves and actually read his work, thanks.

>>1769158
I read the Tractatus while in college and read parts of On Certainty which I have on my shelf here. He regurgitates, albeit in an inferior format ("logical" argument), and when he doesn't regurgitate he says nothing of value because he was not a philosopher, he was more a logician.

>>1769179
I suggest you read his Philosophical Investigations.

>>1769155
>>1769179
>regurgitates
You probs just found out about this word but refrain from using it in this thread anymore
>Nietzsche
Also kill yourself